climate change
; comparative study
; deforestation
; developing world
; institutional framework
; mitigation
; qualitative analysis
; Africa
; Asia
; Latin America
CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia; Helsinki University Centre for Environment, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, Netherlands; School of Earth and Environment, Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Central Africa Forest Commission (COMIFAC), Yaounde, Cameroon; Institute of Human Security and Social Change, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Wondo Genet College of Forestry and Natural Resources, Wondo Genet, Ethiopia; Iwokrama, Kingston Georgetown, Guyana; ForestAction Nepal, Patan, Nepal; Solutions and Evidence for Environment and Development (SEED), Oxford, United Kingdom; Environmental Humanities South (EHS), Department of Sociology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Center for Agriculture and Natural Resource Studies (CEAGRE), Faculty of Agronomy and Forestry, Eduardo Mondlane University of Maputo, Maputo, Mozambique
Recommended Citation:
Korhonen-Kurki K.,Brockhaus M.,Sehring J.,et al. What drives policy change for REDD+? A qualitative comparative analysis of the interplay between institutional and policy arena factors[J]. Climate Policy,2019-01-01,19(3)