globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: doi:10.1038/nclimate2197
论文题名:
China's response to the air pollution shock
作者: Peter Sheehan
刊名: Nature Climate Change
ISSN: 1758-1319X
EISSN: 1758-7439
出版年: 2014-04-25
卷: Volume:4, 页码:Pages:306;309 (2014)
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Socioeconomic scenarios
英文摘要:

Faced with serious air pollution, China is aggressively reshaping its energy system, building on recent progress with renewables and on available supplies of gas. This should help contain global warming and provide new impetus to climate change negotiations.

Over the past decade China accounted for over two-thirds of the growth in global CO2 emissions from energy use. In 2012, its emissions far surpassed those of other major countries and regions1 (Fig. 1). This reflects rapid economic growth in a massive country whose energy system remains largely based on fossil fuels, despite strong progress in renewable energy. This emissions growth has long spelt danger for the global climate. A gradual process to halt the rise in China's emissions by 2030 will alone add over 10% to the already high global level of CO2 emissions from energy use in 2012. China's response to the air pollution crisis suggests that its government is taking action that will bring emissions under control much more abruptly than previously evisaged. Such a rapid process of emissions control could improve prospects of holding global warming to less than 2°C and have important implications for both climate modelling and international climate negotiations.

Figure 1: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel use and cement production for selected countries and regions.
CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel use and cement production for selected countries and regions.

Figure reproduced from ref. 1.

During 2013, air pollution in China became a major economic and social issue across the country ('the pollution shock'). In January 2013, thick smog blanketed Beijing and northern China, covering 2.7 million square kilometres and affecting more than 600 million people. Although varying with weather and other factors, air pollution remained high in many parts of China throughout 2013. It reached extreme levels in Harbin in October 2013 and in Shanghai, normally a city with fairly good air quality, in December 2013. Many cities, including Beijing and Shanghai, experienced a return of heavy air pollution in January and February 2014.

The central concern is with fine particles less than 2.5 micrometres in diameter (PM2.5). These pose the greatest health risks, lodging deeply in the lungs and leading to increased risk of pulmonary and cardiovascular disease and cancer. PM2.5 levels are measured in micrograms per cubic metre (μg m−3). The WHO guideline for the maximum safe level is 25 μg m−3 for a 24 hour period and 10 μg m−3 on an annual basis2. Readings in excess of 500 μg m−3, twenty times the recommended WHO 24 hour level, have become common in many Chinese cities in periods of heavy pollution, with higher spikes occuring on some days. According to official data, average PM2.5 levels for 2013 were more than five times the WHO annual maximum level in 58 Chinese cities3.

Several factors contributed to increasing concern within China. One is the growing realization of the health threat from fine particles, especially at the levels being seen in China. Another is the evident impact of air pollution on people's lives — schools and factories were closed, warnings were issued for the young and elderly to stay indoors, flights were cancelled and so on. A third is the open availability of data, with most cities now collecting and publishing real-time data. On 12 February 2014, the State Council Executive Committee acknowledged the “grave situation” generated by air pollution, which is “cumulative for a long period of time”4. Air pollution has become a national emergency.

The Government's response to this crisis started with the 'Action Plan for Air Pollution Prevention and Control (2013–17)', issued by the State Council on 10 September 20135. The plan targets marked improvement in air quality over the five years to 2017, focusing on three regions that account for 40% of China's GDP: the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region, the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta. The plan includes mandatory 25% reductions in annual average concentrations of PM2.5 by 2017 in Beijing, 20% in the Yangtze River Delta, 15% in the Pearl River Delta and 10% in other key cities.

Crucially, the plan recognizes that achieving these targets requires a transformation of the energy system. For the first time, there is a ban in these regions on new coal power plants and sharp cutbacks in coal consumption and steel production. For example, steel-making capacity in Hebei province, producing one quarter of China's steel, will be reduced by 80 million tonnes by 2017. Heavily polluting vehicles are to be removed from the regions by 2015 and nationally by 2017. The Euro V equivalent fuel standards (petrol and diesel) will be introduced in the regions in 2015 and nationally by 2017. Non-fossil energy resources will rise from 9.4% of total energy consumption in 2012 to 13% by 2017, and there will be increased emphasis on natural gas.

The implementation of this plan is continuing, through detailed local plans and through penalties for cities and officials failing to reach targets. For example, in September 2013 the Beijing government announced that the share of gas in total energy consumption would rise from 14% to 35% over the period 2012–2017, with the share of coal falling from 24% to 10%6. In January 2014, the Guangdong provincial government announced that the coal and oil share would fall from 72.2% in 2010 to 60.6% in 2015, with the gas share more than doubling to 13.2%7.

On 12 February 2014, the Director of the Development Research Center (DRC) of China's State Council provided an unusually frank insight into the Government's objectives8. In addition to slower growth in overall energy use, he indicated specific targets: the coal share to be reduced from 66.6% in 2012 to 60% in 2020 and below 50% in 2030; renewables to rise from 9.4% in 2012 to 15% in 2020 and 25% in 2030 and gas to rise from 5.2% in 2012 to 10% in 2020 and 15% in 2030. He also outlined plans for a new, low-carbon approach to urbanization.

We test whether these abrupt changes are achievable by examining one illustrative scenario through 2020, largely based on the DRC targets but with an earlier shift to natural gas (Table 1 and Fig. 2). This scenario involves a slower growth rate in energy use, a fall in the coal and oil shares in total energy use to 60% and 13% respectively by 2020, and a rise in the renewables and gas shares to 15% and 12% by 2020 respectively. Figure 2a shows that the absolute level of combined coal and oil use peaks by 2020, while Fig. 2b illustrates the abrupt nature of the shift in the structure of energy use. Table 1 also shows a projection of this path to 2030, based on the DRC indications.

Table 1: Energy consumption by fuel source in China.

China's new energy strategy is primarily a response to the air pollution crisis, but will have major implications for greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). There is a large overlap between the sources of PM2.5 and GHG emissions12 (Fig. 4). The primary sources of PM2.5 emissions are coal and oil use, while gas and non-fossil fuels generate few PM2.5 emissions (Fig. 4a). Coal and oil are the dominant sources of GHG emissions, with gas occupying an intermediate position between these and renewable sources, which have low life-cyle GHG emissions.

Figure 4: Lifecycle PM2.5 emissions and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for selected fuel sources used in power generation.
Lifecycle PM2.5 emissions and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for selected fuel sources used in power generation.

a, Lifecycle PM2.5 emissions per unit of energy generated (g kWh−1). b, Lifecycle GHG emissions per unit of energy generated (g CO2e kWh−1). Data taken from ref. 12.

  1. Oliver, J. G. J., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Muntean, M. & Peters, J. A. H. W. Trends in Global CO2 Emissions: 2013 Report (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency and European Commission Joint Research Centre, 2013).
  2. WHO Air Quality Guidelines; http://go.nature.com/3u5AIV
  3. Analysis of data from Ministry of Environmental Protection; http://go.nature.com/ryXvdv
  4. State Council Executive Committee Statement (Ministry of Environmental Pollution, 13 February 2014); http://go.nature.com/tOZNxU
  5. Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan State Council Document Number 37 [in Chinese] (Central Government of the People's Republic of China, 12 September 2013); www.gov.cn
  6. Beijing Clean Air Action Plan (2013–2017) [in Chinese] (Beijing Municipal Government, 2013); www.beijing.gov.cn
  7. Guangdong Province Twelfth Five-Year Plan for Coping with Climate Change [in Chinese] (Guangdong Province Development and Reform Commission, 2014); www.gddpc.gov.cn
  8. Wei, Li. Study on China's future energy development strategy: To construct a safe, green and efficient energy system. [in Chinese] The People's Daily (12 February 2014); http://go.nature.com/Z2m9Zs
  9. National Statistical Bureau of China; accessed through CEIC (2014).
  10. Hong, L., Zhou, N., Fridley, D. & Raczkowski, C. Energy Policy 62, 15331543 (2013).
  11. Gas Pricing and Regulation: China's Challenges and IEA Experiences (IEA, 2012).
  12. Sathaye, J. et al. in Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 9 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011).
  13. Ding, Y., Han, W., Chai, Q., Yang, S. & Shen, W. Energy Policy 55, 445453 (2013).
  14. Yang, C. & Jackson, R. Nature Clim. Change 3, 852854 (2013).

Download references

The authors gratefully acknowledge support for the underlying research from the Australia China Natural Gas Technology Partnership Fund and from the Australian Government under the programme 'Shaping an International Solution to Climate Change'. We are deeply grateful to Jiang Kejun for invaluable advice and to Margarita Kumnick for excellent support. None of these parties are responsible for the views expressed.

Affiliations

  1. Victoria Institute for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, Victoria 8001, Australia

    • Peter Sheehan,
    • Enjiang Cheng,
    • Alex English &
    • Fanghong Sun
URL: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n5/full/nclimate2197.html
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/5141
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响
科学计划与规划
气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
nclimate2197.pdf(870KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取View Download

Recommended Citation:
Peter Sheehan. China's response to the air pollution shock[J]. Nature Climate Change,2014-04-25,Volume:4:Pages:306;309 (2014).
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Peter Sheehan]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Peter Sheehan]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Peter Sheehan]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
文件名: nclimate2197.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.