globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.044
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84902370310
论文题名:
Acidifier application rate impacts on ammonia emissions from US roaster chicken houses
作者: Shah S; B; , Grimes J; L; , Oviedo-Rondón E; O; , Westerman P; W
刊名: Atmospheric Environment
ISSN: 0168-2563
EISSN: 1573-515X
出版年: 2014
卷: 92
起始页码: 576
结束页码: 583
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Acid trap ; Broiler ; Bubblers ; Emission rate ; Impingers ; Litter amendment ; Ventilation
Scopus关键词: Agriculture ; Ammonia ; Animals ; Calcination ; Dairies ; Particulate emissions ; Ventilation ; Broiler ; Bubblers ; Emission rates ; Impingers ; Litter amendments ; Houses ; acidifying agent ; ammonia ; bisulfate sodium ; nitrogen ; unclassified drug ; ammonia ; atmospheric pollution ; bird ; emission inventory ; health impact ; livestock ; public health ; ventilation ; air conditioning ; air pollution ; ammonia formation ; article ; atmospheric pressure ; broiler ; chicken ; climate ; controlled study ; environmental impact ; livestock ; nonhuman ; priority journal ; public health ; scrubber ; United States ; Animalia ; Aves
Scopus学科分类: Environmental Science: Water Science and Technology ; Earth and Planetary Sciences: Earth-Surface Processes ; Environmental Science: Environmental Chemistry
英文摘要: Due to its potential environmental and public health impacts, emissions of ammonia (NH3) as well as several other gases from US livestock farms may be regulated. Broiler houses are important sources of NH3 emissions. However, there are no emissions data from roaster (8-12wk old broilers, ~4kg ea.) houses. Producers treat the litter in broiler houses with acidifiers, such as sodium bisulfate (SBS, NaHSO4) to reduce ammonia production and protect bird health. However, there is very little data on the effect ofacidifiers, particularly at high application rates on ammonia emissions. The impact of different SBSapplication rates [High (0.95-1.46kgm-2, whole house), Medium (0.73kgm-2, whole house), Low (0.37-0.49kgm-2, whole house), and Control (0.37-0.49kgm-2, brood chamber)] on ammonia emissions was evaluated in commercial roaster houses over 22 months spanning eight flocks. Ammonia emission from each fan was measured with an acid scrubber that operated only when the fan operated. Emissions were calculated using ≥95% measured data with the rest being estimated using robust methods. Exhaust ammonia-N concentrations were inversely correlated with the SBSapplication rates. Emission rates on animal unit (AU, where 1 AU=500kg live-mass) basis (ER, gd-1AU-1) were reduced by 27, 13, and 5%, respectively, in the High, Medium, and Low treatments vs. the Control treatment (mean: 100gd-1 AU-1, range: 86-114gd-1 AU-1). Emission rates for the Control treatment measured in this study on roasters were mostly higher than ERs in the literature. Differences in ERs are not only due to diet, environmental and management conditions, but also due to measurement methods. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/81151
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering (BAE), North Carolina State University (NCSU), Raleigh, NC 27695, United States; Department of Poultry Science, NCSU, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States

Recommended Citation:
Shah S,B,, Grimes J,et al. Acidifier application rate impacts on ammonia emissions from US roaster chicken houses[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2014-01-01,92
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Shah S]'s Articles
[B]'s Articles
[, Grimes J]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Shah S]'s Articles
[B]'s Articles
[, Grimes J]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Shah S]‘s Articles
[B]‘s Articles
[, Grimes J]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.