globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-85058132523
论文题名:
Free allocation rules in the EU emissions trading system: what does the empirical literature show?
作者: Verde S.F.; Teixidó J.; Marcantonini C.; Labandeira X.
刊名: Climate Policy
ISSN: 14693062
出版年: 2019
卷: 19, 期:4
起始页码: 439
结束页码: 452
语种: 英语
英文关键词: carbon leakage risk ; cost pass-through ; EU ETS ; free allocation rules
英文摘要: This paper analyses the rules for free allocation in the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). The analysis draws on the empirical evidence emerging from two literature strands. One group of studies sheds light on the following questions: how efficient are free allocation rules in minimizing the risk of carbon leakage? Have they become more efficient over the trading periods? What are the technical limits to making them more efficient? Further: is firm behaviour affected by allowance allocation? Did specific provisions induce strategic behaviour with unintended effects? Studies from the second group estimate sectoral pass-through rates for the costs imposed by the EU ETS. Taking cost pass-through into account is necessary for properly targeting free allocation. The difficulty of accurately quantifying sectoral differences in cost pass-through ability, especially in manufacturing sectors (due to limited data availability and market heterogeneity), is the main hindrance to achieving further efficiency in allowance allocation. The new rules defined in the reform for Phase IV (2021–2030) nevertheless make some progress in this direction. Key policy insights The difficulty of accurately quantifying sectoral differences in cost pass-through ability is the main hindrance to efficient free allocation in minimizing carbon leakage risk. In Phase IV (2021–2030), carbon leakage risk will be assessed more accurately thanks to: a) carbon intensity and trade intensity considered together through a combined indicator; b) possible use of more disaggregated data, and c) possible consideration of complementary qualitative assessments of abatement potential, market characteristics and profit margins. It is expected that benchmarked allocation introduced in Phase III (2013–2020) has induced additional emission abatement, but there is still a lack of empirical evidence. © 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/122568
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: FSR-Climate, European University Institute, Florence, Italy; School of Economics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Italian Regulatory Authority for Electricity Gas and Water, Milan, Italy; Department of Applied Economics, University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain

Recommended Citation:
Verde S.F.,Teixidó J.,Marcantonini C.,et al. Free allocation rules in the EU emissions trading system: what does the empirical literature show?[J]. Climate Policy,2019-01-01,19(4)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Verde S.F.]'s Articles
[Teixidó J.]'s Articles
[Marcantonini C.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Verde S.F.]'s Articles
[Teixidó J.]'s Articles
[Marcantonini C.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Verde S.F.]‘s Articles
[Teixidó J.]‘s Articles
[Marcantonini C.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.