globalchange  > 气候减缓与适应
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.173
WOS记录号: WOS:000449449100022
论文题名:
Life cycle thinking toward sustainable development policy-making: The case of energy retrofits
作者: Pombo, Olatz1,2; Rivela, Beatriz3,4; Neila, Javier1
通讯作者: Rivela, Beatriz
刊名: JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
ISSN: 0959-6526
EISSN: 1879-1786
出版年: 2019
卷: 206, 页码:267-281
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Life cycle thinking ; Public policy ; Energy ; Housing renovation ; Retrofit
WOS关键词: BUILDING ENERGY ; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ; ECONOMIC-ASSESSMENT ; PUBLIC BUILDINGS ; SYSTEMS-APPROACH ; FINANCIAL COST ; EFFICIENCY ; LCA ; CHALLENGES ; STRATEGIES
WOS学科分类: Green & Sustainable Science & Technology ; Engineering, Environmental ; Environmental Sciences
WOS研究方向: Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Engineering ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
英文摘要:

Viable implementation of building energy-efficiency policies is inevitable to mitigate climate change, above all as buildings account for around 40% of the world's energy consumption. Although some 75% of all buildings in Europe are energy-inefficient, only 0.4-1.2% of the whole stock is renovated each year. The greatest challenge for the coming decades is to increase the rate, quality and effectiveness of building renovation. The overall goal of the present article is to illustrate the key role to be played by Life Cycle Thinking in sustainable development policies and its implementation in the design of optimal retrofit solutions. The main housing renovation policies implemented in Spain were submitted to analysis using the focus of Life Cycle Approaches. Representative case studies were selected based on the analysis of 3245 real renovation solutions funded by policy programmes in the period between 2010 and 2014. Current solutions were assessed and compared to other retrofit scenarios that a priori might seem more desirable when striving for energy-efficient buildings. Multi-criteria assessment results reveal that the current renovation strategies applied in Madrid and Seville are, by no means optimal solutions, while only a small additional cost could produce significant performance improvement in Bilbao. The Passivhaus standard that offers the greatest reduction of energy consumption in all three cities would appear, however, not to be the solution of choice for any of them. These findings demonstrate the need to integrate Life Cycle thinking into the building process to identify the most sustainable energy pathways. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/127396
Appears in Collections:气候减缓与适应

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Tech Univ Madrid UPM, Sch Architecture ETSAM, DCTA, Avda Juan de Herrera 4, Madrid 28040, Spain
2.S COOP, LKS Engn, Paseo de La Castellana 18-4,9, Madrid 28046, Spain
3.InViable Life Cycle Thinking, Don Ramon de La Cruz 89, Madrid 28006, Spain
4.Escuela Politec Nacl, Inst Habitat Sci, Avda Ladron de Guevara E11-253, Quito, Ecuador

Recommended Citation:
Pombo, Olatz,Rivela, Beatriz,Neila, Javier. Life cycle thinking toward sustainable development policy-making: The case of energy retrofits[J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION,2019-01-01,206:267-281
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Pombo, Olatz]'s Articles
[Rivela, Beatriz]'s Articles
[Neila, Javier]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Pombo, Olatz]'s Articles
[Rivela, Beatriz]'s Articles
[Neila, Javier]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Pombo, Olatz]‘s Articles
[Rivela, Beatriz]‘s Articles
[Neila, Javier]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.