全球变化知识资源中心

In Tim Mulgan's imaginary "broken world" survivors of catastrophic climate change (or some other disaster) cannot invariably meet their basic needs. Mulgan provides lectures on the moral philosophy of an earlier "affluent age" in which Amartya Sen appears briefly as an "affluent thinker." I argue that some of Sen's work is highly relevant to the concerns of survivors in part because it focusses on conditions of extreme deprivation and survival. While Sen has written about sustainability and environmental concerns both at a foundational level as well as in his work on India, critics may argue that he has failed to engage adequately with these issues. I explore this line of criticism and make some points which are relevant to its evaluation including some which count in Sen's defence. I also argue that Sen's ideas influenced Derek Parfit's seminal work, and are relevant to the subsequent philosophical literature, on future generations.