The spread of influential misinformation, such as conspiracy theories about the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program (SLAP), is contributing to the politicization of science. In an important recent study, Shearer et al (2016 Environ. Res. Lett.11 084011) employ a novel methodology to quantify the expert consensus of popular SLAP assertions. The authors find that 99% (76/77) of surveyed experts have not encountered any evidence that would support the existence of such a program. Here we argue that this finding is important because a growing body of research has shown that the public's perception of expert consensus on key societal issues acts an important 'gateway' to science acceptance. Furthermore, communicating normative agreement among experts, such as the strong scientific consensus against the existence of a SLAP, can help limit the spread of misinformation and promote more effective public decision-making about science and society.
Department of Communication and Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA;Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK;Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
Recommended Citation:
Edward W Maibach,Sander L van der Linden. The importance of assessing and communicating scientific consensus[J]. Environmental Research Letters,2016-01-01,11(9)