globalchange  > 全球变化的国际研究计划
DOI: 10.3390/su11143852
WOS记录号: WOS:000482261800097
论文题名:
Work and Social-Ecological Transitions: A Critical Review of Five Contrasting Approaches
作者: Bottazzi, Patrick1,2
通讯作者: Bottazzi, Patrick
刊名: SUSTAINABILITY
EISSN: 2071-1050
出版年: 2019
卷: 11, 期:14
语种: 英语
英文关键词: political ecology of work ; working-time reduction ; social-ecological transition ; labour environmentalism ; green job ; contributive economy ; contributive justice ; sustainable work ; decommodification of work
WOS关键词: ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ; CLIMATE-CHANGE ; GREEN ECONOMY ; TIME ; EMPLOYMENT ; LIFE ; CONSTRUCTION ; PRODUCTIVITY ; REFLECTIONS ; REDUCTION
WOS学科分类: Green & Sustainable Science & Technology ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies
WOS研究方向: Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
英文摘要:

Going to work has become such a ritualized activity for the modern human that few people challenge its relevance from a sustainability perspective. Since the Industrial Revolution, the prospect of unlimited growth with the aim of jobs creation has been dramatically associated with a massive social-ecological degradation that puts the Earth system at risk. In recent decades, a number of heterodox theories and policies are reconsidering our relationship with work in view of contemporaneous social-ecological challenges. This paper offers critical review of five contrasting approaches. Those promoting green jobs' consider the possibility of transforming ecological constraints into economic opportunities by incentivising eco-efficient innovations and generating new jobs. Conversely, critical approaches, such as working-time reduction (WTR), labour environmentalism, political ecology of work, and contributive economy and justice, defend decommodifying work to liberate pro-social and pro-environmental behaviours. We additionally present two opposing scenarios mainly inspired by critical theories. One illustrates the root causes of systemic lock-in leading to the present social-ecological work-life degradation, while the other illustrates perspectives on the politics of free time' and contributive economy and justice oriented towards building capabilities, and workers' emancipation and justice in search for more sustainable relationships with ecosystems.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/142995
Appears in Collections:全球变化的国际研究计划

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Univ Bern, Inst Geog, Hallerstr 12, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
2.Univ Bern, Ctr Dev & Environm, Mittelstr 43, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland

Recommended Citation:
Bottazzi, Patrick. Work and Social-Ecological Transitions: A Critical Review of Five Contrasting Approaches[J]. SUSTAINABILITY,2019-01-01,11(14)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Bottazzi, Patrick]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Bottazzi, Patrick]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Bottazzi, Patrick]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.