In coastal waters around the world, the dominant primary producers are benthic macrophytes, including seagrasses and macroalgae, that provide habitat structure and food for diverse and abundant biological communities and drive ecosystem processes. Seagrass meadows and macroalgal forests play key roles for coastal societies, contributing to fishery yields, storm protection, biogeochemical cycling and storage, and important cultural values. These socio-economically valuable services are threatened worldwide by human activities, with substantial areas of seagrass and macroalgal forests lost over the last half-century. Tracking the status and trends in marine macrophyte cover and quality is an emerging priority for ocean and coastal management, but doing so has been challenged by limited coordination across the numerous efforts to monitor macrophytes, which vary widely in goals, methodologies, scales, capacity, governance approaches, and data availability. Here, we present a consensus assessment and recommendations on the current state of and opportunities for advancing global marine macrophyte observations, integrating contributions from a community of researchers with broad geographic and disciplinary expertise. With the increasing scale of human impacts, the time is ripe to harmonize marine macrophyte observations by building on existing networks and identifying a core set of common metrics and approaches in sampling design, field measurements, governance, capacity building, and data management. We recommend a tiered observation system, with improvement of remote sensing and remote underwater imaging to expand capacity to capture broad-scale extent at intervals of several years, coordinated with strati fied in situ sampling annually to characterize the key variables of cover and taxonomic or functional group composition, and to provide ground-truth. A robust networked system of macrophyte observations will be facilitated by establishing best practices, including standard protocols, documentation, and sharing of resources at all stages of work flow, and secure archiving of open-access data. Because such a network is necessarily distributed, sustaining it depends on close engagement of local stakeholders and focusing on building and long-term maintenance of local capacity, particularly in the developing world. Realizing these recommendations will producemore effective, efficient, and responsive observing, a more accurate global picture of change in vegetated coastal systems, and stronger international capacity for sustaining observations.
1.Smithsonian Inst, Edgewater, MD 21037 USA 2.Univ Pisa, Dept Biol, Pisa, Italy 3.CoNISMa, Pisa, Italy 4.Univ Santiago de Compostela, Inst Invest Tecnolox, Santiago, Spain 5.NOAA, Phys Oceanog Div, Atlantic Oceanog & Meteorol Lab, Miami, FL USA 6.Univ Miami, Rosenstiel Sch Marine & Atmospher Sci, Cooperat Inst Marine & Atmospher Studies, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149 USA 7.Univ S Florida, Coll Marine Sci, St Petersburg, FL USA 8.Hasanuddin Univ, Dept Marine Sci, Makassar, Indonesia 9.Abo Akad Univ, Fac Sci & Engn, Environm & Marine Biol, Turku, Finland 10.Univ Los Lagos, Ctr I Mar, Puerto Montt, Chile 11.Univ Los Lagos, Ctr Biotecnol & Bioingn CeBiB, Puerto Montt, Chile 12.Univ Massachusetts, Dept Biol, Boston, MA 02125 USA 13.James Cook Univ, Ctr Trop Water & Aquat Ecosyst Res, Douglas, Qld, Australia 14.Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, Dept Ecol, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil 15.Cardiff Univ, Sustainable Pl Res Inst, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales 16.Griffith Univ, Sch Environm & Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia 17.Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst Coast & Estuaries, Brisbane, Qld, Australia 18.King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol, Red Sea Res Ctr, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia 19.Univ Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia 20.Univ Philippines, Marine Sci Inst CS, Quezon City, Philippines 21.NOAA, Atlantic Oceanog & Meteorol Lab, Miami, FL 33149 USA 22.Chinese Acad Sci, South China Sea Inst Oceanol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China 23.Univ Tasmania, Inst Marine & Antarctic Studies, Hobart, Tas, Australia 24.Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Coll Fisheries & Ocean Sci, Fairbanks, AK USA 25.Aarhus Univ, Dept Biosci, Silkeborg, Denmark 26.Aarhus Univ, Arctic Res Ctr, Aarhus, Denmark 27.Bedford Inst Oceanog, Dartmouth, NS, Canada 28.Deakin Univ, Ctr Integrat Ecol, Burwood, Vic, Australia 29.James Cook Univ, Div Trop Environm & Soc, Townsville, Qld, Australia 30.Marine Biol Assoc UK, Plymouth, Devon, England 31.Univ Simon Bolivar, Dept Estudios Ambientales, Caracas, Venezuela 32.Hokkaido Univ, Akkeshi Marine Stn, Field Sci Ctr Northern Biosphere, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan 33.IMR, Bergen, Norway 34.Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Uppsala, Sweden 35.Virginia Inst Marine Sci, Coll William & Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 USA 36.Pince Songkla Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Biol, Hat Yai, Thailand 37.LGL Ecol Res Associates, Bryan, TX USA 38.Univ Costa Rica, Ctr Invest Ciencias Mar & Limnol, San Jose, CA USA 39.Univ Algarve, Ctr Marine Sci CCMAR, Interdisciplinary Ctr Marine & Environm Res CIMAR, Faro, Portugal 40.Univ New Hampshire, Nat Resources & Environm, Durham, NH 03824 USA 41.Univ Porto, Fac Sci, Interdisciplinary Ctr Marine & Environm Res CIIMA, Porto, Portugal 42.Sydney Inst Marine Sci, Mosman, NSW, Australia 43.Swansea Univ, Seagrass Ecosyst Res Grp, Swansea, W Glam, Wales 44.Murdoch Univ, Ctr Sustainable Aquat Ecosyst Environm & Conserva, Murdoch, WA, Australia 45.Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, ICML, Puerto Morelos, Mexico 46.Univ Adelaide, Dept Environm & Water, Adelaide, SA, Australia 47.State Herbarium South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia 48.UN Environm World Conservat Monitoring Ctr, Cambridge, England 49.Univ Western Australia, Oceans Inst, Perth, WA, Australia 50.Univ Western Australia, Sch Biol Sci, Perth, WA, Australia 51.DHI Water & Environm, Ecol Habitats & Proc Dept, Singapore, Singapore
Recommended Citation:
Duffy, J. Emmett,Benedetti-Cecchi, Lisandro,Trinanes, Joaquin,et al. Toward a Coordinated Global Observing System for Seagrasses and Marine Macroalgae[J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE,2019-01-01,6