globalchange  > 全球变化的国际研究计划
DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2019.1630463
WOS记录号: WOS:000479380800001
论文题名:
Learning from the Climate Change Debate to Avoid Polarisation on Negative Emissions
作者: Colvin, R. M.1,6; Kemp, Luke2; Talberg, Anita3; De Castella, Clare1; Downie, C.4; Friel, S.4; Grant, Will J.5; Howden, Mark1; Jotzo, Frank6; Markham, Francis7; Platow, Michael J.8
通讯作者: Colvin, R. M.
刊名: ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE
ISSN: 1752-4032
EISSN: 1752-4040
出版年: 2019
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Framing ; ideology ; geoengineering ; greenhouse gas removal ; climate engineering
WOS关键词: POLITICAL POLARIZATION ; ENGAGEMENT ; SCIENCE ; NEWS ; AUSTRALIA ; IDEOLOGY ; CONFLICT ; BUSINESS ; BELIEFS ; SUPPORT
WOS学科分类: Communication ; Environmental Studies
WOS研究方向: Communication ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
英文摘要:

This paper identifies critical lessons from the climate change experience to guide how communications and engagement on negative emissions can be conducted to encourage functional public and policy discourse. Negative emissions technologies present a significant opportunity for limiting climate change, and are likely to be necessary to keep warming below 2 degrees C. While the concept of negative emissions is still in its infancy, there is evidence of nascent polarization, and a lack of nuance in discussion of individual technologies. We argue that if negative emissions technologies are to be implemented effectively and sustainably, an effective governance regime is needed; built on functional societal discourse and avoiding the ideological baggage of the broader climate change debate or the controversies concerning geoengineering. At its core, our argument is to avoid the ideological bundling of negative emissions; this can be pursued directly and via careful selection of communication frames and the use of non-partisan, trusted messengers. Whether these lessons are heeded may determine if negative emissions are governed proactively, or are distorted politically, misused and delayed.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/143769
Appears in Collections:全球变化的国际研究计划

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Australian Natl Univ, Climate Change Inst, Post Bldg 141,Linnaeus Way, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
2.Univ Cambridge, Ctr Study Existential Risk, Cambridge, England
3.Univ Melbourne, Climate & Energy Coll, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
4.Australian Natl Univ, Sch Regulat & Global Governance, Canberra, ACT, Australia
5.Australian Natl Univ, Natl Ctr Publ Awareness Sci, Canberra, ACT, Australia
6.Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT, Australia
7.Australian Natl Univ, Ctr Aboriginal Econ Policy Res, Canberra, ACT, Australia
8.Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Psychol, Canberra, ACT, Australia

Recommended Citation:
Colvin, R. M.,Kemp, Luke,Talberg, Anita,et al. Learning from the Climate Change Debate to Avoid Polarisation on Negative Emissions[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE,2019-01-01
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Colvin, R. M.]'s Articles
[Kemp, Luke]'s Articles
[Talberg, Anita]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Colvin, R. M.]'s Articles
[Kemp, Luke]'s Articles
[Talberg, Anita]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Colvin, R. M.]‘s Articles
[Kemp, Luke]‘s Articles
[Talberg, Anita]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.