globalchange  > 全球变化的国际研究计划
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.006
WOS记录号: WOS:000482245500031
论文题名:
A novel framework for development and optimisation of future electricity scenarios with high penetration of renewables and storage
作者: Gaete-Morales, Carlos1,2; Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro1,3; Stamford, Laurence1; Azapagic, Adisa1
通讯作者: Azapagic, Adisa
刊名: APPLIED ENERGY
ISSN: 0306-2619
EISSN: 1872-9118
出版年: 2019
卷: 250, 页码:1657-1672
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Climate change ; Energy planning ; Energy storage ; Levelised cost ; Renewable energy ; System optimisation
WOS关键词: POWER-SYSTEM ; ENERGY ; GENERATION ; MODEL ; WIND ; COSTS ; RATES ; TOOL
WOS学科分类: Energy & Fuels ; Engineering, Chemical
WOS研究方向: Energy & Fuels ; Engineering
英文摘要:

Although electricity supply is still dominated by fossil fuels, it is expected that renewable sources will have a much larger contribution in the future due to the need to mitigate climate change. Therefore, this paper presents a new framework for developing Future Electricity Scenarios (FuturES) with high penetration of renewables. A multi-period linear programming model has been created for power-system expansion planning. This has been coupled with an economic dispatch model, PowerGAMA, to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of the developed scenarios while matching supply and demand. Application of FuturES is demonstrated through the case of Chile which has ambitious plans to supply electricity using only renewable sources. Four cost-optimal scenarios have been developed for the year 2050 using FuturES: two Business as usual (BAU) and two Renewable electricity (RE) scenarios. The BAU scenarios are unconstrained in terms of the technology type and can include all 11 options considered. The RE scenarios aim to have only renewables in the mix, including storage. The results show that both BAU scenarios have a levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) lower than, or equal to, today's costs ($72.7-77.3 vs $77.6/MWh) and include 81-90% of renewables. The RE scenarios are slightly more expensive than today's costs ($81-87/MWh). The cumulative investment for the BAU scenarios is $123-$145 bn, compared to $147-$157 bn for the RE. The annual investment across the scenarios is estimated at $4.0 +/- 0.4 bn. Both RE scenarios show sufficient flexibility in matching supply and demand, despite solar photovoltaics and wind power contributing around half of the total supply. Therefore, the FuturES framework is a powerful tool for aiding the design of cost-efficient power systems with high penetration of renewables.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/146985
Appears in Collections:全球变化的国际研究计划

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Univ Manchester, Sch Chem Engn & Analyt Sci, Sustainable Ind Syst, C16,Sackville St, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
2.German Inst Econ Res DIW Berlin, Dept Energy Transportat & Environm, Mohrenstr 58, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
3.Univ Manchester, Sch Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, HG1,Pariser Bldg,Sackville St, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England

Recommended Citation:
Gaete-Morales, Carlos,Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro,Stamford, Laurence,et al. A novel framework for development and optimisation of future electricity scenarios with high penetration of renewables and storage[J]. APPLIED ENERGY,2019-01-01,250:1657-1672
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Gaete-Morales, Carlos]'s Articles
[Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro]'s Articles
[Stamford, Laurence]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Gaete-Morales, Carlos]'s Articles
[Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro]'s Articles
[Stamford, Laurence]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Gaete-Morales, Carlos]‘s Articles
[Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro]‘s Articles
[Stamford, Laurence]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.