globalchange  > 气候变化与战略
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6394
论文题名:
What is important for achieving 2 °c? UNFCCC and IPCC expert perceptions on obstacles and response options for climate change mitigation
作者: Kornek U.; Flachsland C.; Kardish C.; Levi S.; Edenhofer O.
刊名: Environmental Research Letters
ISSN: 17489318
出版年: 2020
卷: 15, 期:2
语种: 英语
英文关键词: agenda setting ; climate change mitigation ; expert elicitation ; obstacles and responses
Scopus关键词: Environmental engineering ; Research ; Academic literature ; Agenda settings ; Climate change mitigation ; Expert elicitation ; Global temperatures ; obstacles and responses ; Quantitative data ; Special interest groups ; Climate change ; climate change ; environmental policy ; expert system ; global change ; global climate ; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ; international agreement ; mitigation ; perception ; prioritization ; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change ; Europe ; North America ; oceanic regions
英文摘要: Global mitigation efforts remain insufficient to limit the global temperature increase to well below 2 °C. While a growing academic literature analyzes this problem, perceptions of which obstacles inhibit goal attainment and which responses might be most effective seem to differ widely. This makes prioritization and agreement on the way forward difficult. To inform prioritization in global climate policy and research agendas, we present quantitative data on how 917 experts from the IPCC and the UNFCCC perceive the importance of different obstacles and response options for achieving 2 °C. On average, respondents consider opposition from special interest groups the most important obstacle and technological R&D the most important response. Our survey also finds that the majority of experts perceives a wide range of issues as important, supporting an agenda that is inclusive in terms of coverage. Average importance ratings differ between experts from the Global North and South, suggesting that balanced representation in global fora and regionally differentiated agendas are important. In particular, opposition from special interest groups is a top priority among experts from North America, Europe and Oceania. Investigating the drivers of individual importance ratings, we find little difference between experts from the IPCC and the UNFCCC, while expert's perceptions correlate with their academic training and their national scientific, regulatory, and financial contexts. © 2020 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
Citation statistics:
被引频次[WOS]:9   [查看WOS记录]     [查看WOS中相关记录]
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/160002
Appears in Collections:气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Torgauer Straße 12-15, Berlin, D-10829, Germany; Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Telegraphenberg A 31, Potsdam, D-14473, Germany; Hertie School of Governance, Friedrichstraße 180, Berlin, D-10117, Germany; Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, Berlin, D-10623, Germany

Recommended Citation:
Kornek U.,Flachsland C.,Kardish C.,et al. What is important for achieving 2 °c? UNFCCC and IPCC expert perceptions on obstacles and response options for climate change mitigation[J]. Environmental Research Letters,2020-01-01,15(2)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Kornek U.]'s Articles
[Flachsland C.]'s Articles
[Kardish C.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Kornek U.]'s Articles
[Flachsland C.]'s Articles
[Kardish C.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Kornek U.]‘s Articles
[Flachsland C.]‘s Articles
[Kardish C.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.