globalchange  > 气候变化与战略
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1921320117
论文题名:
Open science; communal culture; and women's participation in the movement to improve science
作者: Murphy M.C.; Mejia A.F.; Mejia J.; Yan X.; Cheryan S.; Dasgupta N.; Destin M.; Fryberg S.A.; Garcia J.A.; Haines E.L.; Harackiewicz J.M.; Ledgerwood A.; Moss-Racusin C.A.; Park L.E.; Perry S.P.; Ratliff K.A.; Rattan A.; Sanchez D.T.; Savani K.; Sekaquaptewa D.; Smith J.L.; Taylor V.J.; Thoman D.B.; Wout D.A.; Mabry P.L.; Ressl S.; Diekman A.B.; Pestilli F.
刊名: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 0027-8424
出版年: 2020
卷: 117, 期:39
起始页码: 24154
结束页码: 24164
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Culture ; Open science ; Replicability ; Reproducibility ; Women
Scopus关键词: adult ; article ; female ; human ; human experiment ; language ; major clinical study ; reproducibility ; female ; information dissemination ; open access publishing ; science ; writing ; Authorship ; Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Open Access Publishing ; Reproducibility of Results ; Science ; Women
英文摘要: Science is undergoing rapid change with the movement to improve science focused largely on reproducibility/replicability and open science practices. This moment of change-in which science turns inward to examine its methods and practices-provides an opportunity to address its historic lack of diversity and noninclusive culture. Through network modeling and semantic analysis, we provide an initial exploration of the structure, cultural frames, and women's participation in the open science and reproducibility literatures (n = 2,926 articles and conference proceedings). Network analyses suggest that the open science and reproducibility literatures are emerging relatively independently of each other, sharing few common papers or authors. We next examine whether the literatures differentially incorporate collaborative, prosocial ideals that are known to engage members of underrepresented groups more than independent, winner-takes-all approaches. We find that open science has a more connected, collaborative structure than does reproducibility. Semantic analyses of paper abstracts reveal that these literatures have adopted different cultural frames: open science includes more explicitly communal and prosocial language than does reproducibility. Finally, consistent with literature suggesting the diversity benefits of communal and prosocial purposes, we find that women publish more frequently in high-status author positions (first or last) within open science (vs. reproducibility). Furthermore, this finding is further patterned by team size and time. Women are more represented in larger teams within reproducibility, and women's participation is increasing in open science over time and decreasing in reproducibility. We conclude with actionable suggestions for cultivating a more prosocial and diverse culture of science. © 2020 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/164024
Appears in Collections:气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Murphy, M.C., Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Mejia, A.F., Department of Statistics, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47408, United States; Mejia, J., Kelley School of Business, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Yan, X., Network Science Institute, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47408, United States; Cheryan, S., Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States; Dasgupta, N., Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, United States; Destin, M., Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States, School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States; Fryberg, S.A., Department of Psychology, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States; Garcia, J.A., Department of Psychology and Child Development, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, United States; Haines, E.L., Department of Psychology, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ 07470, United States; Harackiewicz, J.M., Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, United States; Ledgerwood, A., Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States; Moss-Racusin, C.A., Department of Psychology, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, United States; Park, L.E., Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, United States; Perry, S.P., Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northeastern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States; Ratliff, K.A., Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, United States; Rattan, A., Organisational Behaviour, London Business School, London, NW1 4SA, United Kingdom; Sanchez, D.T., Department of Psychology, Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States; Savani, K., Management and Organisation, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore; Sekaquaptewa, D., Department of Psychology, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States; Smith, J.L., Office of Research, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO 80918, United States, Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO 80918, United States; Taylor, V.J., Department of Psychology, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, United States, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, United States; Thoman, D.B., Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, United States; Wout, D.A., Department of Psychology, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York, New York, NY 10019, United States; Mabry, P.L., Research Division, HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN 55425, United States; Ressl, S., Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States, Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, United States; Diekman, A.B., Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Pestilli, F., Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States, Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, United States

Recommended Citation:
Murphy M.C.,Mejia A.F.,Mejia J.,et al. Open science; communal culture; and women's participation in the movement to improve science[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2020-01-01,117(39)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Murphy M.C.]'s Articles
[Mejia A.F.]'s Articles
[Mejia J.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Murphy M.C.]'s Articles
[Mejia A.F.]'s Articles
[Mejia J.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Murphy M.C.]‘s Articles
[Mejia A.F.]‘s Articles
[Mejia J.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.