|
There are no files associated with this item.
|
|
作者单位: | Organic Geochemistry Group, MARUM-Center for Marine Environmental Sciences and Department of Geosciences, University of Bremen, Leobener Str. 8, Bremen, 28359, Germany; LIAG, Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics, Stilleweg 2, Hannover, 30655, Germany; BayCEER & Chair of Geomorphology, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, 95440, Germany; Romanian Academy, Institute of Speleology, Cluj-Napoca, 400006, Romania; Physical Geography, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia; Department of Geography, RWTH Aachen University, Templergraben 55, Aachen, 52056, Germany
|
| Recommended Citation: | |
Obreht I.,Zeeden C.,Hambach U.,et al. Reply to the discussion paper by P. Sümegi and S. Gulyás: Some notes on the interpretation and reliability of malacological proxies in paleotemperature reconstructions from loess- comments to Obreht et al.'s “A critical reevaluation of paleoclimate proxy records from loess in the Carpathian Basin”[J]. Earth Science Reviews,2021-01-01,220
|
|
|