globalchange  > 气候变化与战略
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111166
论文题名:
Capacity vs energy subsidies for promoting renewable investment: Benefits and costs for the EU power market
作者: Özdemir Ö.; Hobbs B.F.; van Hout M.; Koutstaal P.R.
刊名: Energy Policy
ISSN: 03014215
出版年: 2020
卷: 137
语种: 英语
中文关键词: Capacity subsidy ; Electricity markets ; Energy subsidy ; Renewable policy ; Renewable target
英文关键词: Carbon dioxide ; Commerce ; Cost benefit analysis ; Cost effectiveness ; Cost reduction ; Gas emissions ; Power markets ; Renewable energy resources ; Benefits and costs ; Capacity installation ; Capacity subsidy ; Electric power markets ; Energy subsidies ; Renewable policy ; Renewable portfolio standard ; Technology improvement ; Investments ; alternative energy ; cost-benefit analysis ; electricity generation ; electricity supply ; energy policy ; European Union ; investment ; subsidy system ; Europe
英文摘要: Policy makers across Europe have implemented renewable support policies with several policy objectives in mind. Among these are achieving ambitious renewable energy targets at the lowest cost, reducing CO2-emissions and promoting technology improvement through learning-by-doing. Using a detailed country-level model of generation markets, we address the question of how policies that subsidize renewable energy (feed-in premia and renewable portfolio standards (RPSs)) versus capacity (investment subsidies) impact the mix of renewable investments, electricity costs, renewable share, the amount of subsidies, and consumer prices in the EU electric power market in 2030 and how they interact with other policies such as the EU ETS. Our analysis shows that subsidies of energy output are cost-effective for achieving renewable energy targets in the short run, whereas policies tied to capacity installation yield more investment and might be more effective in reducing technology costs in the longer term. The difference in costs between these two policy options diminish with higher CO2-prices. Although the differences are significant, they are smaller than cost impacts of other renewable policy design features, namely the effect of not allowing EU members to meet their individual targets by trading renewable credits with other member states. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/167407
Appears in Collections:气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bezuidenhoutseweg 30, Den Haag, 2594 AV, Netherlands; The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States

Recommended Citation:
Özdemir Ö.,Hobbs B.F.,van Hout M.,et al. Capacity vs energy subsidies for promoting renewable investment: Benefits and costs for the EU power market[J]. Energy Policy,2020-01-01,137
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Özdemir Ö.]'s Articles
[Hobbs B.F.]'s Articles
[van Hout M.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Özdemir Ö.]'s Articles
[Hobbs B.F.]'s Articles
[van Hout M.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Özdemir Ö.]‘s Articles
[Hobbs B.F.]‘s Articles
[van Hout M.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.