DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111920
论文题名: Demand response: For congestion management or for grid balancing?
作者: Stawska A. ; Romero N. ; de Weerdt M. ; Verzijlbergh R.
刊名: Energy Policy
ISSN: 03014215
出版年: 2021
卷: 148 语种: 英语
中文关键词: Congestion
; Demand response
; Energy flexibility
; Flexibility market
; Grid tariffs
; Imbalance market
英文关键词: Energy policy
; Congestion management
; Demand response
; Distribution systems
; Financial incentives
; Grid balancing
; Grid problems
; Intermittent energy source
; Local flexibility
; Commerce
; comparative study
; demand analysis
; energy market
; energy resource
; market conditions
; tariff structure
英文摘要: The growing capacity of intermittent energy sources causes more frequent system imbalances as well as congestion. Demand flexibility is a valuable resource that can be used to resolve these. Unfortunately, flexibility can also contribute to congestion, particularly when used to balance the grid. Using flexibility to solve grid problems without creating new ones requires well-designed financial incentives. Congestion management mechanisms (CMMs) are a primary example of such incentives. The question is which of these is most effective in preventing congestion with minimal impact on trading on the imbalance market. This question is answered by comparing traditional CMMs such as grid tariffs to a local flexibility market on their impact on the load in the grid and the lost value of flexibility on the imbalance market. This analysis shows that energy tariffs are not suited for preventing congestion. Capacity tariffs are able to prevent congestion but they impose limitations on the consumer which significantly reduce the value of flexibility on the imbalance market. The flexibility market, an example of a local market, is effective if aggregators do not have a position day ahead or if the distribution system operator limits the buying of flexibility a day before delivery. © 2020 The Author(s) Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/168030
Appears in Collections: 气候变化与战略
There are no files associated with this item.
作者单位: Department of Software Technology, TU Delft, Van Mourik Broekmanweg 6, XE Delft, 2628, Netherlands; Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, TU Delft, Jaffalaan 5, BX Delft, 2628, Netherlands; Priogen, Radarweg 60, NT Amsterdam, 1043, Netherlands
Recommended Citation:
Stawska A.,Romero N.,de Weerdt M.,et al. Demand response: For congestion management or for grid balancing?[J]. Energy Policy,2021-01-01,148