globalchange  > 气候变化与战略
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102185
论文题名:
Testing smarter control and feedback with users: Time, temperature and space in household heating preferences and practices in a Living Laboratory
作者: Sovacool B.K.; Osborn J.; Martiskainen M.; Lipson M.
刊名: Global Environmental Change
ISSN: 9593780
出版年: 2020
卷: 65
语种: 英语
中文关键词: Big data ; Energy feedback ; Energy practices ; Heating and cooling ; Living lab ; Smart energy ; Smart homes
英文关键词: control system ; heating ; laboratory method ; monument ; policy making ; temperature effect ; testing method ; trade-off ; Australia ; Birmingham [England] ; Bridgend ; England ; Greater Manchester ; Manchester [England] ; Midlands [England] ; New South Wales ; Newcastle [New South Wales] ; Northumberland ; United Kingdom ; Wales ; West Midlands
英文摘要: Transitioning to more efficient and less carbon-intensive heating is a monumental policy challenge in the United Kingdom. However, very few households in the UK—and perhaps even elsewhere—have actual experience with state-of-the-art smart heating systems that may utilize enhanced control or feedback. Drawing from a unique sample of actual adopters of smart heating, this study closely examines the heating preferences, practices, and profiles of homes when they are given smarter heating systems. The study utilizes qualitative household data from the Energy System Catapult's Living Laboratory of 100 smart homes in Birmingham (West Midlands), Bridgend (Wales), Manchester (Greater Manchester), and Newcastle (Northumberland). We examine the heating preferences and profiles of participants, with findings inductively organized around the themes of temperature, including tradeoffs between comfort, cost, and value; time, including the utility of heat scheduling; and space, including zonal heating controls. We also discuss patterns of learning, the emergence of environmental values, and issues of discomfort. We conclude by commenting on important distinctions between radiant and ambient heat, as well as between scheduled and on-demand heat. The main findings are 1) tradeoffs between comfort, value and cost occur when it comes to smart heating; 2) people want different numbers of warm hours in their homes at very different times; 3) households chose to heat different numbers of rooms; and 4) there are other non-monetary and non-functional aspects of smart heating that households value. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
Citation statistics:
被引频次[WOS]:11   [查看WOS记录]     [查看WOS中相关记录]
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/168233
Appears in Collections:气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), School of Business, Management, and Economics, University of Sussex, United Kingdom; Center for Energy Technologies, Department of Business Development and Technology, Aarhus University, Denmark; Energy Systems Catapult, United Kingdom

Recommended Citation:
Sovacool B.K.,Osborn J.,Martiskainen M.,et al. Testing smarter control and feedback with users: Time, temperature and space in household heating preferences and practices in a Living Laboratory[J]. Global Environmental Change,2020-01-01,65
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Sovacool B.K.]'s Articles
[Osborn J.]'s Articles
[Martiskainen M.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Sovacool B.K.]'s Articles
[Osborn J.]'s Articles
[Martiskainen M.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Sovacool B.K.]‘s Articles
[Osborn J.]‘s Articles
[Martiskainen M.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.