globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: doi:10.1038/nclimate2537
论文题名:
Psychology: Climate change and group dynamics
作者: Tom Postmes
刊名: Nature Climate Change
ISSN: 1758-1030X
EISSN: 1758-7150
出版年: 2015-02-02
卷: Volume:5, 页码:Pages:195;196 (2015)
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Social scientist/Social science ; Geography/geographer ; Sociology/sociologist ; Environmental economics/Economist ; Climate policy ; Environmental policy ; Global change ; Earth system science ; Climatologist ; Climate science ; Carbon management ; Carbon markets ; Energy ; Renewables ; Palaeoclimatology/Palaeoclimatologist ; Climate modelling/modeller ; Carbon cycle ; Atmospheric scientist ; Oceanography/marine science ; Sustainability ; Geophysicist/Geophysics ; Biogeoscience/Biogeoscientist ; Hydrology/Hydrogeology ; Greenhouse gas verification ; Ecologist/ecology ; Conservation ; Meteorology/meteorologist
英文摘要:

The characteristics and views of people sceptical about climate change have been analysed extensively. A study now confirms that sceptics in the US have some characteristics of a social movement, but shows that the same group dynamics propel believers.

A minority of the public are sceptical about the idea that humans cause climate change. This has received a lot of attention in the media as well as in scientific research. Many became concerned when scepticism — a marginal phenomenon in many countries across the globe — increased in the US and a few other (mainly anglophone) countries towards the end of the 2000s1. Research into the causes of US scepticism has pointed to links with party politics, polarization (that is, conflictual relations between republicans and democrats) and the involvement of conservative think-tanks. Writing in Nature Climate Change, Bliuc and colleagues2 now show that sceptical US citizens see themselves as part of a sceptic movement. This means that their actions are determined not just by their individual beliefs and political views, but also by a shared social identity and by competition with believers. But importantly, Bliuc et al. show that those who believe in climate change also act as members of a group. This finding suggests that to cope with the climate change contrarian movement, efforts on education, persuasion or political messages will not suffice. To convince a sceptical public, believers need to harness knowledge about social movements and intergroup conflict reduction.

Interest in sceptics, their views and tactics has increased sharply in recent years. I conducted a basic search of articles mentioning climate change and/or global warming in conjunction with the words scepticism, denier, denial and/or contrarians on Web of Science and identified 226 papers published since 2000. Of these, 121 analysed scepticism itself, with the vast majority (112) published since 2010 (Fig. 1).

Figure 1: The number of scientific articles investigating climate scepticism among the public, or through analysis of discourse in media or books.
The number of scientific articles investigating climate scepticism among the public, or through analysis of discourse in media or books.

Counts were made of a convenience sample of studies identified through a search of Web of Science (accessed 8 January 2015) of articles using the words (sceptic*, denial*, denier*, and/or contrarian*) and (climate change or global warming) — asterisks were used as wildcards in the search. Author conducted the search and coded the articles.

  1. Capstick, S., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N. & Upham, P. WIREs Clim. Change 6, 3561 (2015).
  2. Bliuc, A. M. et al. Nature Clim. Change 5, 226229 (2015).
  3. Hmielowski, J. D., Feldman, L., Myers, T. A., Leiserowitz, A. & Maibach, E. Publ. Underst. Sci. 23, 866883 (2014).
  4. Corner, A., Whitmarsh, L. & Xenias, D. Climatic Change 114, 463478 (2012).
  5. Rees, J. H. & Bamberg, S. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 44, 466473 (2014).
  6. Duncan, L. E. in The Oxford Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology (eds Deaux, K. & Snyder, M.) 781803 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).
  7. McCright, A. M. & Dunlap, R. E. Sociol. Q. 52, 155194 (2011).
  8. Reicher, S. et al. Policing 1, 403415 (2007).
  9. Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R. & Jeffries, C. Nature Clim. Change 2, 600603 (2012).
  10. Bray, D. Environ. Sci. Policy 13, 340350 (2010).
  11. Poortinga, W., Spence, A., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S. & Pidgeon, N. F. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 10151024 (2011).

Download references

Affiliations

  1. Tom Postmes is in the Department of Social Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2, 9712 TS Groningen, the Netherlands

URL: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v5/n3/full/nclimate2537.html
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/4858
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响
科学计划与规划
气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
nclimate2537.pdf(108KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取View 联系获取全文

Recommended Citation:
Tom Postmes. Psychology: Climate change and group dynamics[J]. Nature Climate Change,2015-02-02,Volume:5:Pages:195;196 (2015).
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Tom Postmes]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Tom Postmes]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Tom Postmes]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
文件名: nclimate2537.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.