globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0861.1
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84983494453
论文题名:
Assessment of arctic cloud cover anomalies in atmospheric reanalysis products using satellite data
作者: Liu Y.; Key J.R.
刊名: Journal of Climate
ISSN: 8948755
出版年: 2016
卷: 29, 期:17
起始页码: 6065
结束页码: 6083
语种: 英语
Scopus关键词: Climatology ; Clouds ; Image reconstruction ; Radiometers ; Satellite imagery ; Satellites ; Atmospheric reanalysis ; Climate variability ; Cloud cover ; Cloud-aerosol lidar and infrared pathfinder satellite observations ; Correlation coefficient ; Interannual variation ; Moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer satellites ; Reanalysis ; Climate models
英文摘要: Cloud cover is one of the largest uncertainties in model predictions of the future Arctic climate. Previous studies have shown that cloud amounts in global climate models and atmospheric reanalyses vary widely and may have large biases. However, many climate studies are based on anomalies rather than absolute values, for which biases are less important. This study examines the performance of five atmospheric reanalysis products-ERA-Interim, MERRA, MERRA-2, NCEP R1, and NCEP R2-in depicting monthly mean Arctic cloud amount anomalies against Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite observations from 2000 to 2014 and against Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) observations from 2006 to 2014. All five reanalysis products exhibit biases in the mean cloud amount, especially in winter. The Gerrity skill score (GSS) and correlation analysis are used to quantify their performance in terms of interannual variations. Results show that ERA-Interim, MERRA, MERRA-2, and NCEP R2 perform similarly, with annual mean GSSs of 0.36/0.22, 0.31/0.24, 0.32/0.23, and 0.32/0.23 and annualmean correlation coefficients of 0.50/0.51, 0.43/0.54, 0.44/0.53, and 0.50/0.52 againstMODIS/CALIPSO, indicating that the reanalysis datasets do exhibit some capability for depicting the monthlymean cloud amount anomalies. There are no significant differences in the overall performance of reanalysis products. They all perform best in July, August, and September and worst in November, December, and January. All reanalysis datasets have better performance over land than over ocean. This study identifies the magnitudes of errors in Arctic mean cloud amounts and anomalies and provides a useful tool for evaluating future improvements in the cloud schemes of reanalysis products.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/50124
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Center for Satellite Applications and Research, NOAA/NESDISWI, United States

Recommended Citation:
Liu Y.,Key J.R.. Assessment of arctic cloud cover anomalies in atmospheric reanalysis products using satellite data[J]. Journal of Climate,2016-01-01,29(17)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Liu Y.]'s Articles
[Key J.R.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Liu Y.]'s Articles
[Key J.R.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Liu Y.]‘s Articles
[Key J.R.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.