globalchange  > 影响、适应和脆弱性
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12591
论文题名:
Co-benefits, trade-offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector
作者: Bustamante M.; Robledo-Abad C.; Harper R.; Mbow C.; Ravindranat N.H.; Sperling F.; Haberl H.; Pinto A.S.; Smith P.
刊名: Global Change Biology
ISSN: 13541013
出版年: 2014
卷: 20, 期:10
起始页码: 3270
结束页码: 3290
语种: 英语
英文关键词: AFOLU ; Agriculture ; Climate ; Ecosystem service ; Food security ; Forestry ; GHG ; Mitigation
Scopus关键词: agriculture ; climate change ; ecosystem service ; environmental policy ; food security ; forestry ; greenhouse gas ; land use ; mitigation ; trade-off ; gas ; soil ; agriculture ; animal ; climate change ; environmental protection ; forestry ; gas ; greenhouse effect ; livestock ; policy ; prevention and control ; soil ; Agriculture ; Animals ; Climate Change ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Forestry ; Gases ; Greenhouse Effect ; Livestock ; Policy ; Soil
英文摘要: The agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector is responsible for approximately 25% of anthropogenic GHG emissions mainly from deforestation and agricultural emissions from livestock, soil and nutrient management. Mitigation from the sector is thus extremely important in meeting emission reduction targets. The sector offers a variety of cost-competitive mitigation options with most analyses indicating a decline in emissions largely due to decreasing deforestation rates. Sustainability criteria are needed to guide development and implementation of AFOLU mitigation measures with particular focus on multifunctional systems that allow the delivery of multiple services from land. It is striking that almost all of the positive and negative impacts, opportunities and barriers are context specific, precluding generic statements about which AFOLU mitigation measures have the greatest promise at a global scale. This finding underlines the importance of considering each mitigation strategy on a case-by-case basis, systemic effects when implementing mitigation options on the national scale, and suggests that policies need to be flexible enough to allow such assessments. National and international agricultural and forest (climate) policies have the potential to alter the opportunity costs of specific land uses in ways that increase opportunities or barriers for attaining climate change mitigation goals. Policies governing practices in agriculture and in forest conservation and management need to account for both effective mitigation and adaptation and can help to orient practices in agriculture and in forestry towards global sharing of innovative technologies for the efficient use of land resources. Different policy instruments, especially economic incentives and regulatory approaches, are currently being applied however, for its successful implementation it is critical to understand how land-use decisions are made and how new social, political and economic forces in the future will influence this process. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/62146
Appears in Collections:影响、适应和脆弱性

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade de Brasília, I.B. C.P. 04457, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro - UnB, D.F. Brasília, Brazil; Department of Environmental Systems Science, USYS TdLab, Universitaetstrasse 22, CHN J70.1, Zurich, Switzerland; HELVETAS Swiss Intercooperation, Maulbeerstr. 10, Bern, Switzerland; School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, WA, Australia; World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Research Unit: GRP5, Office: PO Box 30677-00100, Nairobi, Kenya; Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Centre for Sustainable Technologies (CST), Bangalore, India; Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Change, African Development Bank, Tunis Belvedere B.P. 323, Tunisia; Institute of Social Ecology Vienna (SEC), Alpen-Adria Universitaet (AAU), Schottenfeldgasse 29, Vienna, Austria; Integrative Research Institute on Transformations of Human-Environment Systems (IRI THESys), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Friedrichstraße 191, Berlin, Germany; Departamento de Ecologia, C.C.B.S., Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Cidade Universitária Prof. Jose Aloisio de Campos, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil; Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, ClimateXChange and Scottish Food Security Alliance-Crops, University of Aberdeen, 23 St Machar Drive, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom

Recommended Citation:
Bustamante M.,Robledo-Abad C.,Harper R.,et al. Co-benefits, trade-offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector[J]. Global Change Biology,2014-01-01,20(10)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Bustamante M.]'s Articles
[Robledo-Abad C.]'s Articles
[Harper R.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Bustamante M.]'s Articles
[Robledo-Abad C.]'s Articles
[Harper R.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Bustamante M.]‘s Articles
[Robledo-Abad C.]‘s Articles
[Harper R.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.