globalchange  > 影响、适应和脆弱性
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12160
论文题名:
How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?
作者: Smith P.; Haberl H.; Popp A.; Erb K.-H.; Lauk C.; Harper R.; Tubiello F.N.; De Siqueira Pinto A.; Jafari M.; Sohi S.; Masera O.; Böttcher H.; Berndes G.; Bustamante M.; Ahammad H.; Clark H.; Dong H.; Elsiddig E.A.; Mbow C.; Ravindranath N.H.; Rice C.W.; Robledo Abad C.; Romanovskaya A.; Sperling F.; Herrero M.; House J.I.; Rose S.
刊名: Global Change Biology
ISSN: 13541013
出版年: 2013
卷: 19, 期:8
起始页码: 2285
结束页码: 2302
语种: 英语
英文关键词: AFOLU ; Agriculture ; Climate ; Ecosystem services ; Food security ; Forestry ; GHG ; Mitigation
Scopus关键词: agriculture ; climate change ; demand-side management ; ecosystem service ; environmental economics ; environmental quality ; food security ; forestry ; greenhouse gas ; land management ; mitigation ; policy implementation ; trade-off ; AFOLU ; agriculture ; catering service ; climate ; climate change ; ecosystem ; ecosystem services ; environmental protection ; food security ; forestry ; gas ; GHG ; greenhouse effect ; human ; mitigation ; review ; AFOLU ; agriculture ; climate ; ecosystem services ; food security ; forestry ; GHG ; mitigation ; Agriculture ; Climate Change ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Ecosystem ; Food Supply ; Forestry ; Gases ; Greenhouse Effect ; Humans
英文摘要: Feeding 9-10 billion people by 2050 and preventing dangerous climate change are two of the greatest challenges facing humanity. Both challenges must be met while reducing the impact of land management on ecosystem services that deliver vital goods and services, and support human health and well-being. Few studies to date have considered the interactions between these challenges. In this study we briefly outline the challenges, review the supply- and demand-side climate mitigation potential available in the Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use AFOLU sector and options for delivering food security. We briefly outline some of the synergies and trade-offs afforded by mitigation practices, before presenting an assessment of the mitigation potential possible in the AFOLU sector under possible future scenarios in which demand-side measures codeliver to aid food security. We conclude that while supply-side mitigation measures, such as changes in land management, might either enhance or negatively impact food security, demand-side mitigation measures, such as reduced waste or demand for livestock products, should benefit both food security and greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation. Demand-side measures offer a greater potential (1.5-15.6 Gt CO2-eq. yr-1) in meeting both challenges than do supply-side measures (1.5-4.3 Gt CO2-eq. yr-1 at carbon prices between 20 and 100 US$ tCO2-eq. yr-1), but given the enormity of challenges, all options need to be considered. Supply-side measures should be implemented immediately, focussing on those that allow the production of more agricultural product per unit of input. For demand-side measures, given the difficulties in their implementation and lag in their effectiveness, policy should be introduced quickly, and should aim to codeliver to other policy agenda, such as improving environmental quality or improving dietary health. These problems facing humanity in the 21st Century are extremely challenging, and policy that addresses multiple objectives is required now more than ever. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/62374
Appears in Collections:影响、适应和脆弱性

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences and ClimateXChange, University of Aberdeen, 23 St Machar Drive, Aberdeen, Scotland AB24 3UU, United Kingdom; Institute of Social Ecology Vienna (SEC), Alpen-Adria Universitaet (AAU), Schottenfeldgasse 29, Vienna 1070, Austria; Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Research Domain III: Sustainable Solutions, Telegraphenberg A 62, Potsdam D-14473, Germany; School of Environmental Science, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia; Mitigation of Climate Change in Agriculture Programme, Natural Resources Management and Environment Department, FAO, Via Terme di Caracalla, Rome 00153, Italy; Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade de Brasília, I.B. C.P. 04457, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro - UnB. D.F. CEP, Brasília 70919-970, Brazil; Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, National Botanical Garden of Iran, P.O. Box 13185-116, Tehran, Iran; UK Biochar Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Crew Building, The King's Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN, United Kingdom; Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, UNAM, AP 27-3 Xangari, Morelia, Michoacán 58089, Mexico; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Ecosystem Services and Management Program, Schlossplatz 1, Laxenburg A-2361, Austria; Department of Energy and Environment, Physical Resource Theory, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg SE-412 96, Sweden; ABARE, GPO Box 1563, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre, Grasslands Research Centre, Tennent Drive, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand; Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 12 Southern Street of Zhongguancun, Beijing 100081, China; Faculty of Forestry, University of Khartoum, Khartoum 13314, Sudan; World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Research Unit: GRP5; Office, Room G197, PO Box 30677-00100, Nairobi, Kenya; Centre for Sustainable Technologies (CST), Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Bangalore 560 012, India; Department of Agronomy, Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States; Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED), Natural and Social Science Interface (NSSI), Universitaetstrasse 22, CHN J74.1, Zurich 8092, Switzerland; HELVETAS Swiss Intercooperation, Maulbeerstr. 10, Bern CH 3001, Switzerland; Institute of Global Climate and Ecology, Glebovskaya str, 20-B, Moscow 107258, Russian Federation; Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Change, African Development Bank, B.P. 323 - 1002 Belvedere, Tunis, Tunisia; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, 306 Carmody Road, St Lucia, 4067 QLD, Australia; International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya; Cabot Institute, School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol BS8 1SS, United Kingdom; Energy and Environmental Analysis Research Group, EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute), 2000 L Street NW, Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Recommended Citation:
Smith P.,Haberl H.,Popp A.,et al. How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?[J]. Global Change Biology,2013-01-01,19(8)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Smith P.]'s Articles
[Haberl H.]'s Articles
[Popp A.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Smith P.]'s Articles
[Haberl H.]'s Articles
[Popp A.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Smith P.]‘s Articles
[Haberl H.]‘s Articles
[Popp A.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.