DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.12.020
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-85008889376
论文题名: Estimating aboveground biomass of broadleaf, needleleaf, and mixed forests in Northeastern China through analysis of 25-m ALOS/PALSAR mosaic data
作者: Ma J. ; Xiao X. ; Qin Y. ; Chen B. ; Hu Y. ; Li X. ; Zhao B.
刊名: Forest Ecology and Management
ISSN: 0378-1127
出版年: 2017
卷: 389 起始页码: 199
结束页码: 210
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Aboveground live biomass
; ALOS/PALSAR
; Boosted regression tree
; Nonlinear regression models
; Northeastern China
; Topographical and stand structure factors
Scopus关键词: Backscattering
; Biomass
; Carbon
; Regression analysis
; Synthetic aperture radar
; Aboveground live biomass
; ALOS/PALSAR
; Boosted regression trees
; Nonlinear regression models
; Northeastern China
; Stand structures
; Forestry
英文摘要: Aboveground biomass (AGB) of temperate forest plays an important role in global carbon cycles and needs to be estimated accurately. ALOS/PALSAR (Advanced Land Observing Satellite/Phased Array L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar) data has recently been used to estimate forest AGB. However, the relationships between AGB and PALSAR backscatter coefficients of different forest types in Northeastern China remain unknown. In this study, we analyzed PALSAR data in 2010 and observed AGB data from 104 forest plots in 2011 of needleleaf forest, mixed forest, and broadleaf forest in Heilongjiang province of Northeastern China. “Poisson” regression in generalized linear models (GLMs) and BRT (boosted regression tree) analysis in generalized boosted models (GBMs) were used to test whether the constructed PALSAR/AGB models based on individual forest types have better performance. We also investigated whether adding topographical and stand structure factors into the regression models can enhance the model performance. Results showed that GBM model had a better performance in fitting the relationships between AGB and PALSAR backscatter coefficients than did GLM model for needleleaf forest (RMSE = 3.81 Mg ha−1, R2 = 0.98), mixed forest (RMSE = 17.72 Mg ha−1, R2 = 0.96), and broadleaf forest (RMSE = 19.94 Mg ha−1, R2 = 0.96), and performance of nonlinear regression models constructed on individual forest types were higher than that on all forest plots. Moreover, fitting results of GLM and GBM models were both enhanced when topographical and stand structure factors were incorporated into the predictor variables. Regression models constructed based on individual forest types outperform than that based on all forest plots, and the model performance will be enhanced when incorporating topographical and stand structure factors. With information of forest types, topography, and stand features, PALSAR data can express its full ability in accurate estimation of forest AGB. © 2016 Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/64474
Appears in Collections: 影响、适应和脆弱性
There are no files associated with this item.
作者单位: Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Institute of Biodiversity Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, Center for Spatial Analysis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States; Rubber Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Danzhou Investigation & Experiment Station of Tropical Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Danzhou, China; Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, China
Recommended Citation:
Ma J.,Xiao X.,Qin Y.,et al. Estimating aboveground biomass of broadleaf, needleleaf, and mixed forests in Northeastern China through analysis of 25-m ALOS/PALSAR mosaic data[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2017-01-01,389