globalchange  > 影响、适应和脆弱性
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.01.027
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84923023940
论文题名:
Assessing patterns of oak regeneration and C storage in relation to restoration-focused management, historical land use, and potential trade-offs
作者: Carter D.R.; Fahey R.T.; Dreisilker K.; Bialecki M.B.; Bowles M.L.
刊名: Forest Ecology and Management
ISSN:  0378-1127
出版年: 2015
卷: 343
起始页码: 53
结束页码: 62
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Adaptation ; Legacy effects ; Mitigation ; Natural areas ; Repeated fire
Scopus关键词: Biomass ; Climate change ; Conservation ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Forestry ; Land use ; Reforestation ; Restoration ; Storage management ; Adaptation ; Climate mitigations ; Ecosystem restoration ; Intensive management ; Legacy effects ; Mitigation ; Natural areas ; Prescribed burning ; Economic and social effects ; carbon sequestration ; community composition ; dicotyledon ; land use change ; light availability ; management practice ; mitigation ; prescribed burning ; regeneration ; restoration ecology ; trade-off ; urbanization ; Forest Management ; Land Use ; Quercus ; Restoration ; Illinois ; Lisle ; United States
英文摘要: Restoration of composition, structure, and function in oak dominated ecosystems is the focus of management in temperate forests around the world. Land managers focused on oak ecosystem restoration are challenged by the legacy effects of complex land-use histories, urbanization, climate change, and potential stakeholder response to management. Trade-offs may exist between managing forests for climate mitigation (e.g., maximizing C storage or sequestration) and promoting shade-intolerant species historically associated with frequent or high-severity disturbances. This study assessed the potentially conflicting goals of sustained live biomass accrual and increased oak regeneration in the East Woods Natural Area at The Morton Arboretum in Lisle, IL, USA. We evaluated how biomass trends and oak regeneration were related to management regimes, land-use history, current stand structure and composition, and topoedaphic factors. Our results indicated no significant trade-off between sustained live biomass accrual and oak regeneration. Live biomass was increasing across the landscape (biomass increment averaged 18,186kgha-1yr-1) and was not strongly related to differences in management or land-use history. Oak regeneration was rare, especially beyond the seedling stage (~226 seedlings and 9 saplings ha-1) and was also not strongly related to recent management. Our results indicate that even 20+ years of annual prescribed burning combined with understory thinning has failed to produce the open canopy conditions and high light availability that are necessary for successful oak recruitment. The absence of any trade-offs between biomass accrual and oak regeneration may, therefore, be largely related to the ineffectiveness of current management for promoting oak regeneration. More intensive management utilizing canopy manipulations could produce greater trade-offs, but is likely necessary to establish and release oak regeneration. © 2015 Elsevier B.V.
Citation statistics:
被引频次[WOS]:8   [查看WOS记录]     [查看WOS中相关记录]
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/65511
Appears in Collections:影响、适应和脆弱性

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL, United States

Recommended Citation:
Carter D.R.,Fahey R.T.,Dreisilker K.,et al. Assessing patterns of oak regeneration and C storage in relation to restoration-focused management, historical land use, and potential trade-offs[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2015-01-01,343
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Carter D.R.]'s Articles
[Fahey R.T.]'s Articles
[Dreisilker K.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Carter D.R.]'s Articles
[Fahey R.T.]'s Articles
[Dreisilker K.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Carter D.R.]‘s Articles
[Fahey R.T.]‘s Articles
[Dreisilker K.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.