DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.010
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84870347204
论文题名: Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation
作者: Onaindia M. ; Fernández de Manuel B. ; Madariaga I. ; Rodríguez-Loinaz G.
刊名: Forest Ecology and Management
ISSN: 0378-1127
出版年: 2013
卷: 289 起始页码: 1
结束页码: 9
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Biodiversity
; Carbon storage
; Ecosystem services
; Forest plantation
; Hotspot
; Water flow regulation
Scopus关键词: Carbon storage
; Ecosystem services
; Forest plantation
; Hot spot
; Water flows
; Biodiversity
; Commerce
; Conservation
; Ecosystems
; Environmental protection
; Flow of water
; Geographic information systems
; Hydraulics
; Forestry
; biodiversity
; carbon sequestration
; deciduous forest
; ecosystem management
; ecosystem service
; flow regulation
; GIS
; hot spot
; plantation
; protected area
; riparian forest
; trade-off
; water flow
; Biodiversity
; Carbon
; Commerce
; Conservation
; Ecosystems
; Flow Control
; Forestry
; GIS
; Plantations
; Water Flow
; Eucalyptus
; Fagus
英文摘要: The trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation were analysed in a biosphere reserve area. With the aim of proposing criteria for conservation plans that would include ecosystem services and biodiversity, a Geographic Information System (GIS)-based approach was designed to estimate and map the value of the biodiversity and ecosystem services. The actual protected areas, namely, coastal ecosystems and Cantabrian evergreen-oak forests, were found to be important for the overall biodiversity and included some important portions of the other services. The non-protected natural forests, such as the mixed-oak, beech and riparian forests, are biodiversity hotspots, and they contribute to the carbon storage and water flow regulation services. Thus, even though these areas are small, their inclusion in conservation proposals should be considered. The pine and eucalyptus plantations contribute to ecosystem services but have negative effects on biodiversity and cause environmental problems. In contrast to the plantations of fast-growing species, the increase in broadleaf plantations will exhibit a positive trend due to the benefits they provide. Our study highlights that the inclusion of ecosystem services in conservation planning has a great potential to provide opportunities for biodiversity protection; however, strategies of conservation based only on specific ecosystem services may be detrimental to the biodiversity and may cause other environmental problems. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/66813
Appears in Collections: 影响、适应和脆弱性
There are no files associated with this item.
作者单位: Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, University of the Basque Country, Barrio Sarriena s/n, 48940 Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain
Recommended Citation:
Onaindia M.,Fernández de Manuel B.,Madariaga I.,et al. Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2013-01-01,289