| DOI: | 10.1002/wcc.452
|
| Scopus记录号: | 2-s2.0-85007449475
|
| 论文题名: | Understanding the rhetoric of climate science debates |
| 作者: | Walsh L
|
| 刊名: | Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
|
| ISSN: | 17577780
|
| 出版年: | 2017
|
| 卷: | 8, 期:3 | | 语种: | 英语
|
| 英文关键词: | Climate debates
; Climate science
; Daily lives
; nocv1
; Policy makers
; Technology
; climate change
; communication
; environmental statement
; historical perspective
; ideology
; stakeholder
|
| 英文摘要: | Scientists and policymakers alike frequently call for the elimination of rhetoric from discussions of climate science. These calls betray some fundamental misunderstandings about the 2500-year-old art of rhetoric. Once these are dispelled, it becomes apparent that what we need for effective climate-science debate is not less rhetoric but more: that is, more sensitivity to the political frame within which every debate takes place and how that frame shapes deliberation; more awareness of the unstated values and assumptions supporting statements made on all sides; more ways to link climate to stakeholders’ daily lives, values, and decisions. This article briefly introduces readers to the history and theory of rhetoric for two purposes: (1) explaining the various and sometimes contradictory ways in which this ancient discipline shapes the communication of climate science and (2) providing readers with a few simple but powerful tools for coping with climate debates. WIREs Clim Change 2017, 8:e452. doi: 10.1002/wcc.452. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
| Citation statistics: |
|
| 资源类型: | 期刊论文
|
| 标识符: | http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/76176
|
| Appears in Collections: | 影响、适应和脆弱性
气候变化与战略
|
|
There are no files associated with this item.
|
|
作者单位: | Department of English, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, United States
|
| Recommended Citation: | |
Walsh L. Understanding the rhetoric of climate science debates[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,2017-01-01,8(3)
|
|
|