Barium compounds
; Budget control
; Carbon dioxide
; Climate models
; Climatology
; Crops
; Land use
; Nitrates
; Rain
; Sensitivity analysis
; Soils
; Stream flow
; Surface water resources
; Surface waters
; Water quality
; Water resources
; Watersheds
; Chesapeake Bay watershed
; Climate variability and change
; Conservation practices
; General circulation model
; Hydrological response
; Soil and water assessment tool
; Water quality problems
; Water use efficiency
; Climate change
; carbon dioxide
; climate change
; climate effect
; coastal plain
; comparative study
; denitrification
; general circulation model
; hydrological response
; land use
; light use efficiency
; nitrate
; precipitation (climatology)
; scenario analysis
; soil and water assessment tool
; streamflow
; water quality
; water use efficiency
; watershed
; Chesapeake Bay
; United States
Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States; US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory, Beltsville, MD, United States; School of Engineering, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia; Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States; US Geological Survey, Eastern Geographic Science Center, Reston, VA, United States; US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Falls Church, VA, United States; Department of Energy and Environment, Government of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC, United States
Recommended Citation:
Lee S,, Yeo I,-Y,et al. Comparative analyses of hydrological responses of two adjacent watersheds to climate variability and change using the SWAT model[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2018-01-01,22(1)