DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2014.905822
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84919845813
论文题名: REDD+ Readiness progress across countries: time for reconsideration
作者: Minang P ; A ; , Van Noordwijk M ; , Duguma L ; A ; , Alemagi D ; , Do T ; H ; , Bernard F ; , Agung P ; , Robiglio V ; , Catacutan D ; , Suyanto S ; , Armas A ; , Silva Aguad C ; , Feudjio M ; , Galudra G ; , Maryani R ; , White D ; , Widayati A ; , Kahurani E ; , Namirembe S ; , Leimona B
刊名: Climate Policy
ISSN: 1469-3062
EISSN: 1752-7457
出版年: 2014
卷: 14, 期: 6 起始页码: 685
结束页码: 708
语种: 英语
英文关键词: indicators
; national systems: Readiness functions
; REDD+ Readiness
Scopus学科分类: nvironmental Science: General Environmental Science
; Earth and Planetary Sciences: Atmospheric Science
英文摘要: Efforts towards Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation plus conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of carbon stocks (REDD+) have grown in importance in developing countries following negotiations within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This has favoured investments in processes to prepare countries for REDD+ at the national level (a process referred to as REDD+ Readiness). Yet, little attention has been given to how Readiness can be assessed and potentially improved. This article presents a framework for Readiness assessment and compares progress in REDD+ Readiness across four countries, namely Cameroon, Indonesia, Peru, and Vietnam. The Readiness assessment framework comprises six functions, namely planning and coordination; policy, laws, and institutions; measurement, reporting, verification (MRV), and audits; benefit sharing; financing; and demonstrations and pilots. We found the framework credible and consistent in measuring progress and eliciting insight into Readiness processes at the country level. Country performance for various functions was mixed. Progress was evident on planning and coordination, and demonstration and pilots. However, MRV and audits; financing; benefit sharing; and policies, laws and institutions face major challenges. The results suggest that the way national forest governance has been shaped by historical circumstances (showing path dependency) is a critical factor for progress in Readiness processes. There is need for a rethink of the current REDD+ Readiness infrastructure given the serious gaps observed in addressing drivers of deforestation and forest degradation, linking REDD+ to broader national strategies and systematic capacity building. © 2014 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/80450
Appears in Collections: 科学计划与规划
There are no files associated with this item.
作者单位: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), United Nations Avenue, PO Box 30677-00100, Nairobi, Kenya; World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Southeast Asia Regional Office, Situ Gede, Bogor, Indonesia; World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), West and Central Africa Regional Office, PO Box 16317, Yaoundé, Cameroon; World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Vietnam, No. 8, Lot 13A, Trung Hoa Street Yen Hoa Ward, Hanoi, Cau Giay District, Viet Nam; World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Regional office for Latin America, CIP. PO Box 1558. Lima 12, Peru; Research4development&conservation, Burlington, VT, United States
Recommended Citation:
Minang P,A,, Van Noordwijk M,et al. REDD+ Readiness progress across countries: time for reconsideration[J]. Climate Policy,2014-01-01,14(6)