DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.076
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84946557683
论文题名: Field comparison of portable and stationary instruments for outdoor urban air exposure assessments
作者: Viana M ; , Rivas I ; , Reche C ; , Fonseca A ; S ; , Pérez N ; , Querol X ; , Alastuey A ; , Álvarez-Pedrerol M ; , Sunyer J
刊名: Atmospheric Environment
ISSN: 0168-2563
EISSN: 1573-515X
出版年: 2015
卷: 123 起始页码: 220
结束页码: 228
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Indoor
; Intercomparison
; Outdoor
; Performance
; Relative error
; Uncertainty
Scopus关键词: Particle size
; Shape memory effect
; Indoor
; Intercomparisons
; Outdoor
; Performance
; Relative errors
; Uncertainty
; Particulate emissions
; black carbon
; air exposure
; black carbon
; electronic equipment
; error analysis
; indoor air
; particle size
; performance assessment
; urban region
; air monitor
; air monitoring
; air quality
; Article
; controlled study
; microaethalometer
; particulate matter
; priority journal
; Southern European
; surface area
; time series analysis
; urban area
; Southern Europe
Scopus学科分类: Environmental Science: Water Science and Technology
; Earth and Planetary Sciences: Earth-Surface Processes
; Environmental Science: Environmental Chemistry
英文摘要: The performance of three portable monitors (micro-aethalometer AE51, DiscMini, Dusttrak DRX) was assessed for outdoor air exposure assessment in a representative Southern European urban environment. The parameters evaluated were black carbon, particle number concentration, alveolar lung-deposited surface area, mean particle diameter, PM10, PM2.5 and PM1. The performance was tested by comparison with widely used stationary instruments (MAAP, CPC, SMPS, NSAM, GRIMM aerosol spectrometer). Results evidenced a good agreement between most portable and stationary instruments, with R2 values mostly >0.80. Relative differences between portable and stationary instruments were mostly <20%, and <10% between different units of the same instrument. The only exception was found for the Dusttrak DRX measurements, for which occasional concentration jumps in the time series were detected. Our results validate the performance of the black carbon, particle number concentration, particle surface area and mean particle diameter monitors as indicative instruments (tier 2) for outdoor air exposure assessment studies. © 2015 The Authors. Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/81419
Appears in Collections: 气候变化事实与影响
There are no files associated with this item.
作者单位: IDAEA-CSIC, Jordi Girona 18, Barcelona, Spain; Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UFP), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; Hospital del Mar Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
Recommended Citation:
Viana M,, Rivas I,, Reche C,et al. Field comparison of portable and stationary instruments for outdoor urban air exposure assessments[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2015-01-01,123