globalchange  > 气候减缓与适应
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-017-1896-1
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-85009446431
论文题名:
Framing REDD+ in the Brazilian national media: how discourses evolved amid global negotiation uncertainties
作者: Gebara M.F.; May P.H.; Carmenta R.; Calixto B.; Brockhaus M.; Di Gregorio M.
刊名: Climatic Change
ISSN: 0165-0009
EISSN: 1573-1480
出版年: 2017
卷: 141, 期:2
起始页码: 213
结束页码: 226
语种: 英语
Scopus关键词: Commerce ; Deforestation ; Forestry ; Climate regime ; Media coverage ; Policy debates ; Policy options ; Policy process ; Reducing emissions ; Supporting policies ; Tropical countries ; Climate change ; carbon emission ; climate change ; deforestation ; degradation ; environmental economics ; equity ; implementation process ; international agreement ; mass media ; negotiation process ; perception ; Brazil
英文摘要: Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD+) in tropical countries is an important and contested element of the post-Kyoto climate regime. For policy options which generate controversy between diverse actor groups, such as REDD+, mass media plays an important role in defining and supporting policy possibilities. Analysis of the way in which national media frames issues of climate change and deforestation can offer insights into the nature of the contested domains of the REDD+ policy process. Here, we examine the Brazilian national media discourses surrounding REDD+ because it contributes to setting the tone of policy debates at the federal level. Specifically, we ask the following: (i) How was REDD+ portrayed in the Brazilian national print media and whose opinions and perceptions were represented? and (ii) How have media frames on REDD+ in the national print media changed over time? Our results contribute with new knowledge for understanding the observed progress of REDD+ in Brazil. We identify two main themes that dominate the focus in the national media coverage of REDD+, specifically “politics and policymaking” (representing half the coverage) and “economics and market” (with over a third). Results show that discussions around carbon markets were amongst the most contested and that optimism in relation to REDD+ effectiveness declined over time. The analysis suggests that positions adopted on the national REDD+ strategy were shaped by state and federal collision of interests. We demonstrate an evolution of national concerns from an initial focus on efficiency (e.g. finance and carbon markets) to a recentred focus on equity issues (e.g. implementation of safeguards). We conclude with some thoughts on the implications of these features for REDD+ interventions and implementation in Brazil. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/84089
Appears in Collections:气候减缓与适应
气候变化事实与影响

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, 16 Holly Bush Vale, London, United Kingdom; Center for International Forestry Research, P.O. Box 0113 BOCBD, Bogor, Indonesia; Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Edifício Central - Av. Pres. Vargas, 417 - Centro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Avenida Jaguaré 1485, 6, São Paulo, Brazil; University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, Helsinki, Finland; Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds, West Yorkshire, Leeds, United Kingdom

Recommended Citation:
Gebara M.F.,May P.H.,Carmenta R.,et al. Framing REDD+ in the Brazilian national media: how discourses evolved amid global negotiation uncertainties[J]. Climatic Change,2017-01-01,141(2)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Gebara M.F.]'s Articles
[May P.H.]'s Articles
[Carmenta R.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Gebara M.F.]'s Articles
[May P.H.]'s Articles
[Carmenta R.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Gebara M.F.]‘s Articles
[May P.H.]‘s Articles
[Carmenta R.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.