globalchange  > 过去全球变化的重建
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.02.054
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-85042853758
论文题名:
Support for improved quality control but misplaced criticism of GBR science reply to viewpoint “The need for a formalised system of Quality Control for environmental policy-science” by P. Larcombe and P. Ridd (Marine Pollution Bulletin 126: 449–461, 2018)
作者: Schaffelke B.; Fabricius K.; Kroon F.; Brodie J.; De'ath G.; Shaw R.; Tarte D.; Warne M.; Thorburn P.
刊名: Marine Pollution Bulletin
ISSN: 0025-326X
EISSN: 1879-3363
出版年: 2018
卷: 129, 期:1
起始页码: 357
结束页码: 363
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Great Barrier Reef ; Policy ; Quality control ; Water quality
Scopus关键词: Decision making ; Environmental protection ; Marine pollution ; Pollution control ; Public policy ; Publishing ; Quality assurance ; Reefs ; Water quality ; Environmental policy ; Great Barrier Reef ; Hand in hands ; Scientific merits ; Quality control ; decision making ; environmental policy ; quality control ; water quality ; article ; decision making ; environmental policy ; publication ; quality control ; sea pollution ; synthesis ; water quality ; Australia ; Coral Sea ; Great Barrier Reef ; Queensland
Scopus学科分类: Agricultural and Biological Sciences: Aquatic Science ; Earth and Planetary Sciences: Oceanography ; Environmental Science: Pollution
英文摘要: This is a response to the published Viewpoint by Larcombe and Ridd (2018). We agree with Larcombe and Ridd (2018) that scientific merit goes hand in hand with rigorous quality control. However, we are responding here to several points raised by Larcombe and Ridd (2018) which in our view were misrepresented. We describe the formal and effective science review, synthesis and advice processes that are in place for science supporting decision-making in the Great Barrier Reef. We also respond in detail to critiques of selected publications that were used by Larcombe and Ridd (2018) as a case study to illustrate shortcomings in science quality control. We provide evidence that their representation of the published research and arguments to support the statement that “many (…) conclusions are demonstrably incorrect” is based on misinterpretation, selective use of data and over-simplification, and also ignores formal responses to previously published critiques. © 2018 The Authors
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/88365
Appears in Collections:过去全球变化的重建
全球变化的国际研究计划

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Australian Institute of Marine Science, PMB 3, QLD, Townsville MC, Australia; Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia; Reef Independent Science Panel, Graceville, Australia; Marine Ecosystem Policy Advisors, Redland Bay, Australia; Mackay-Whitsunday Healthy Rivers to Reef Partnership, Australia; Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom; Queensland Department of Environment and Science, Dutton Park, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Recommended Citation:
Schaffelke B.,Fabricius K.,Kroon F.,et al. Support for improved quality control but misplaced criticism of GBR science reply to viewpoint “The need for a formalised system of Quality Control for environmental policy-science” by P. Larcombe and P. Ridd (Marine Pollution Bulletin 126: 449–461, 2018)[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin,2018-01-01,129(1)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Schaffelke B.]'s Articles
[Fabricius K.]'s Articles
[Kroon F.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Schaffelke B.]'s Articles
[Fabricius K.]'s Articles
[Kroon F.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Schaffelke B.]‘s Articles
[Fabricius K.]‘s Articles
[Kroon F.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.