| 报告题名: | Criteria for Evaluating Climate Policy Scenarios |
| 作者: | Lena Donat LLM; Ennid Roberts LLM; Matthias Duwe
|
| 出版者: | Ecologic Institute, Germany
|
| 出版年: | 2014
|
| 发表日期: | 2014
|
| 国家: | 德国
|
| 语种: | 英语
|
| 英文摘要: | The international community has come up with numerous and often complex suggestions for the design of a new climate agreement to be adopted during the 21st session of the Conference of the Parties (COP21) in Paris in 2015 ('2015 Agreement'). These design options are currently being discussed under Workstream 1 of the 'Ad-hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action' (ADP) by Parties to the UNFCCC. This report provides a practical criteria matrix to assist policy makers in evaluating and comparing different proposals for the 2015 Agreement.Based on an analysis of Parties' submissions under ADP Workstream 1, this paper analyses to what extent the criteria proposed in literature find support among Parties, also identifying whether relevant criteria have been omitted in literature. The analysis shows a high degree of convergence for some criteria that were listed in relevant literature, most importantly 'ambition', 'participation', 'compliance' and 'equity or fairness'. In contrast, other criteria, such as 'systemic coherence' did not find mentioning at all in the submissions we analysed. Our analysis further identified criteria that were not reflected in the relevant literature but widely embraced by Parties in their ADP submissions, such as 'assisting the vulnerable', 'durability' or 'flexibility'. Finally, analysing the submissions revealed that some criteria from literature were apparently too vague and broad, subsuming a wide range of interpretations that might better be reflected in distinct criteria. This concerns first and foremost the concept of 'equity or fairness'.The report proposes a new criteria matrix which incorporates criteria that are widely reflected in Parties' submissions, and precise and specific enough to facilitate the evaluation of design proposals for the 2015 Agreement. The proposed matrix includes criteria relating to environmental effectiveness (level of ambition, level of active participation, stringency of MRV system, stringency of compliance check and enforcement), equity-related criteria (differentiation according to historical responsibility, differentiation according to evolving responsibility, differentiation according to capacities and needs, assisting the vulnerable) and other criteria (institutional feasibility, durability, flexibility, cost-effectiveness).Applying this matrix to proposed governance frameworks can assist policy makers to compare the features of the proposal to their preferred negotiated outcome, and to identify common ground with other Parties' preferred options.The report was published as part of the project "Mobilizing and Transferring Knowledge on post-2012 Climate Policy Implications (POLIMP)" . |
| 资助项目: | Mobilizing and Transferring Knowledge on post-2012 Climate Policy Implications (POLIMP)#2722#
|
| URL: | http://www.polimp.eu/images/results/D3.4_-_Criteria_for_evaluating_Climate_Policy_scenarios.pdf
|
| 资源类型: | 研究报告
|
| 标识符: | http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/42532
|
| Appears in Collections: | 过去全球变化的重建
影响、适应和脆弱性
科学计划与规划
气候变化与战略
全球变化的国际研究计划
气候减缓与适应
气候变化事实与影响
|
| File Name/ File Size |
Content Type |
Version |
Access |
License |
|
|---|
| D3.4_-_Criteria_for_evaluating_Climate_Policy_scenarios.pdf（1100KB） | 研究报告 | -- | 开放获取 | | View
Download
|
|
| Recommended Citation: | |
Lena Donat LLM,Ennid Roberts LLM,Matthias Duwe. Criteria for Evaluating Climate Policy Scenarios. 2014-01-01.
|
|
|