英文摘要: | We define ‘grey swan’ tropical cyclones as high-impact storms that would not be predicted based on history but may be foreseeable using physical knowledge together with historical data. Here we apply a climatological–hydrodynamic method to estimate grey swan tropical cyclone storm surge threat for three highly vulnerable coastal regions. We identify a potentially large risk in the Persian Gulf, where tropical cyclones have never been recorded, and larger-than-expected threats in Cairns, Australia, and Tampa, Florida. Grey swan tropical cyclones striking Tampa, Cairns and Dubai can generate storm surges of about 6 m, 5.7 m and 4 m, respectively, with estimated annual exceedance probabilities of about 1/10,000. With climate change, these probabilities can increase significantly over the twenty-first century (to 1/3,100–1/1,100 in the middle and 1/2,500–1/700 towards the end of the century for Tampa). Worse grey swan tropical cyclones, inducing surges exceeding 11 m in Tampa and 7 m in Dubai, are also revealed with non-negligible probabilities, especially towards the end of the century.
The term ‘black swan’1, 2 is a metaphor for a high-consequence event that comes as a surprise. Some high-consequence events that are unobserved and unanticipated may nevertheless be predictable (although perhaps with large uncertainty); such events may be referred to as ‘grey swans’3, 4 (or, sometimes, ‘perfect storms’5). Unlike truly unpredicted and unavoidable black swans, which can be dealt with only by fast reaction and recovery, grey swans—although also novel and outside experience—can be better foreseen and systematically prepared for4, 5. Tropical cyclones (TCs) often produce extreme wind, rainfall and storm surges in coastal areas. Storm surges are especially complex functions of TC characteristics (track, intensity and size) and coastal features (geometry and bathymetry), and they are also the most fatal and destructive aspect of TCs (see ref. 6 for a comprehensive review of global TC surge observations and impacts). Hence, storm surge is an appropriate and practical metric for identifying grey swan TCs. The most infamous TC disasters early this century were attributable to storm surges, but they should not be considered grey swans, as they had been or could have been anticipated based on historical observations and/or experience. Hurricane Katrina (2005), the costliest US natural disaster, generated the highest US recorded surge flooding (~10 m; ref. 7), but its impact on New Orleans, due largely to the levee failure, had been anticipated by various studies8. Cyclone Nargis (2008), the worst natural disaster in Myanmar’s history and one of the deadliest TCs worldwide, struck Myanmar’s Ayeyarwady River Delta at an unusually low latitude (near 16° N) and induced extreme surges (over 5 m); however, the catastrophic fatalities in the hardest-hit areas were largely due to the lack of evacuation plans and cyclone awareness9, although intense tropical cyclones had been active in the Bay of Bengal and made landfall in Myanmar (for example, in 2006). Hurricane Sandy, which devastated the US Northeast coast in 2012, set the record-high storm tide (3.4 m) at the Battery in New York City (NYC); however, its storm surge (2.8 m) at the Battery was much lower than those of the 1821 NY hurricane (4.0 m; refs 10, 11) and more severe grey swan TCs (4.5–5 m) that had been simulated for the region12, 13. Typhoon Haiyan (2013), the deadliest TC in Philippine history, and probably the most powerful TC to make landfall worldwide, generated extreme water levels up to 8 m near the most-affected Tacloban area14, but the water level was comparable to those induced by earlier storms, including a severe typhoon that struck the area in 1897 (7.3 m; refs 6, 15). Prediction of a grey swan TC is meaningful and practically useful only when associated with some likelihood/probabilistic statement; for example, the probability of exceeding the storm surge level induced by the TC in a year is 10−3. The Monte Carlo (MC) method, based on numerous synthetic simulations, is an important way to assess the probability of grey swan TCs. Most current MC methods16, 17, 18 simulate synthetic TCs using (fairly limited) historical TC statistics. In contrast, a statistical–deterministic model19, which is independent of the TC record, simulates TC environments statistically and generates TCs in the simulated environments deterministically. This statistical–deterministic approach may sometimes be more reliable, as observations of the large-scale TC environment are often better constrained than those of TC characteristics in areas with very limited TC history. It is also more likely to generate unexpected but realistic grey swan TCs, because, rather than extrapolating historical TCs, it applies physical knowledge of TCs and ample observations of the large-scale environment. Moreover, as the synthetic TC environments can be generated for any given climate state, this model can simulate grey swan TCs not only in the current and past climates but also in projected future climates20. As TC activity may vary with changing climate21, 22, 23, 24, the model enables quantitative projection of how grey swan TCs will evolve in the future. This statistical–deterministic TC model has been integrated with hydrodynamic surge models25 into a climatological–hydrodynamic method13, which has been shown to generate extreme storm surges that are far beyond historical records but are compatible with geologic evidence26. The method has been used to study storm surge risk and mitigation strategies for NYC (refs 27, 28), and it is applicable to any coastal city. Here we apply the method to another three highly vulnerable regions: Tampa in Florida, Cairns in Australia, and the Persian Gulf; we identify their grey swan TCs as the synthetic TCs that are associated with extremely low annual exceedance probabilities (large mean return periods) of the induced storm surges (see Methods).
Tampa, located on the central west Florida coast, is highly susceptible to storm surges. Although many fewer storms have made landfall in this area than in regions farther north and west on the Gulf Coast or further south on the Florida Coast, Tampa Bay is surrounded by shallow water and low-lying lands; a 6-m rise of water can inundate much of the Bay’s surroundings29. Two significant historical events have affected Tampa. The Tampa Bay hurricane of 1848 produced the highest storm tide ever experienced in the Bay, about 4.6 m, destroying many of the few human works and habitations then in the area. The Tampa Bay hurricane of 1921 produced an estimated storm tide of 3–3.5 m, inducing severe damage (10 million in 1921 USD). To investigate the current TC threat for Tampa we simulate 7,800 Tampa Bay synthetic TC surge events in the observed climate of 1980–2005 (late twentieth century) as estimated from the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis30. To study how the threat will evolve from the current to future climates, we apply each of six climate models to simulate 2,100 surge events for the climate of 1980–2005 (control) and 3,100 surge events for each of the three climates–2006–2036 (early twenty-first century), 2037–2067 (middle), and 2068–2098 (late)–under the IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 emission scenario. The six climate models, selected as in ref. 24 from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), are CCMS4 (denoted as CCMS; NCAR), GFDL-CM3 (GFDL; NOAA), HADGEM2-ES (HADGEM; UK Met Office Hadley Centre), MPI-ESM-MR (MPI; Max Planck Institution), MIROC5 (MIROC; CCSR/NIES/FRCGC, Japan), and MRI-CGCM3 (MRI; Meteorological Research Institute, Japan). The large synthetic surge database includes many extreme events affecting Tampa. As a comparison, the 1921 Tampa surge event is also simulated (Fig. 1a). The 1921 Tampa hurricane had a track similar to that of the 1848 Tampa hurricane31, travelling northwestwards over the Gulf of Mexico and making landfall north of Tampa Bay. The ‘worst’ synthetic case (among 7,800 events) in the reanalysis climate of 1980–2005 has a similar track (Fig. 1b). However, this grey swan TC is more intense (upper Category 3, compared to the lower Category 2 1921 storm), inducing a higher surge at Tampa of over 5.9 m (compared to 4.0 m simulated for the 1921 storm). We have also identified grey swan TCs affecting Tampa that have very different tracks, especially those moving northwards parallel to the west Florida coast before making landfall. For example, Fig. 1c shows an extremely intense storm (104 m s−1; ‘worst’ case generated under the late twenty-first-century climate projected by HADGEM) that moves northwards parallel to the coast and turns sharply towards Tampa Bay, inducing a storm surge of 11.1 m in Tampa. In such cases, the storm surges are probably amplified by coastally trapped Kelvin Waves. These waves form when the storm travels along the west Florida coast and propagate northwards along the Florida shelf, enhancing the coastal surges, especially when the storm moves parallel to the shelf and at comparable speed to the wave phase speed32. This geophysical feature makes Tampa Bay even more susceptible to storm surge.
| http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v6/n1/full/nclimate2777.html
|